UPDATED ON:
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
23:17 Mecca time, 20:17 GMT
 
FOCUS: SYRIA
Seeking peace, yearning for Golan

Refugees from Golan hope that Israeli-Syrian peace talks will point to a lasting peace between the two enemies and, eventually, repatriation [GALLO/GETTY]

Former residents of the Golan Heights are hopeful that ongoing Turkish-led peace talks between Syria and Israel can reunite them with the land that has been occupied since 1967.

"It needs to happen. Everyone wants peace," said Munir Kanshaw, a Circassian, who was 19-years-old during the 1967 War, when Israel seized much of the Syrian province of Qunaytra, now known as the Golan Heights.
 
"It is what everyone hopes for. Peace is everything."

But he does have doubts and is wary of previous peace talks which collapsed. 

The land was captured by Israel in the 1967 War. Syria and Egypt launched a surprise attack on the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights in the 1973 War but failed to recapture it.
 
In 1974, Israel destroyed the main city of Qunaytra (in the province of Qunaytra) following a pullback negotiated by Henry Kissinger, the former US secretary of state.

In 1981, Israel annexed the occupied Golan Heights and today, there are some 20,000 Jewish settlers in the Golan.

The United Nations considers the Golan occupied territory.

No surprise

Recent overtures and peace talks between Israel and Syria "should not have surprised anyone," Joel Beinin, professor of Middle East history at Stanford University, told Al Jazeera.
 
Following the 1991 Gulf War, the US engaged Syria in talks over the Golan.

But by the mid-1990s, several rounds of Israeli-Syrian negotiations mediated by Bill Clinton, the former US president, collapsed in Geneva over territorial disagreements.

"The Syrian president died in June 2000 and was succeeded by his son, Bashar. In 2004, when the younger al-Assad felt his rule had stabilised, Syria resumed contacts with Israel," Beinin told Al Jazeera.

Refugees from Qunaytra, who have lived for some 40 years in Damascus, say they are optimistic about the land-for-peace negotiations.

"If you think about taking someone's land and living in peace and security, that's impossible," Kanshaw, now 60 says. "The best years were stolen from people of my generation."

Kanshaw now lives in a house he built himself on the road from Damascus to Qunaytra.

"We started our lives from zero. I am doing alright now. But we need to think about our children. I don't need to explain anything to my kids. They have seen the destroyed town, they know who did it, and they watch the news."

Temporary became permanent

Analysts believe a settlement over the Golan can lead to a regional peace deal
During the 1967 War, five-year-old Walid Abu Asalay and his family left Qunaytra for what they thought was temporary sanctuary in Damascus.

"Weeks, months went by. It was really frustrating for my father, because he had almost completed building our house in Qunaytra," recalls Abu Asalay, now a Damascus resident.

"After that, my father never owned another house."

The 1973 War saw a small victory for Syria when it won back part of the Golan Heights, including the city of Qunaytra, the capital of the province by the same name. Abu Asalay's family thought they would see their home again.

Instead, following the 1974 cease-fire, they returned to a ghost town of levelled buildings; those standing were pockmarked with bullet holes. Their house was one of hundreds dynamited to the ground.

When his father saw his home town, Abu Asalay recalls: "His face looked dead. He was 50 years old at the time. How do you start a new life then?"

But unlike his father, Abu Asalay is optimistic about the prospects for peace with Israel.

"We hope peace will come," he says on a break between his two jobs as hotel manager and restaurant manager, both in the Christian Quarter of Old Damascus.

"It has to happen."

Like a dream

The ruins of Qunaytra, destroyed it in 1974, still stand today [ANDERSEN]
Issa Khalil was just a year old when his family was uprooted from Qunaytra following the war.

He admits, "It is hard to remember. It's like a dream."

"But, the Golan is my home."

As for the ongoing negotiations, he says, "Peace is important, and so is connection to the land. We call it 'a just peace'."

In fact, his connection to the land was so strong that he worked as a postman on the Syrian side of the Golan Heights for 12 years, right on the border with Israel.

Being there, he says, "made me want to return to the land, which is now occupied by Israel. There is a longing for the land. I was there just last week to see friends on the Syrian side."

Khalil, a Muslim, says he refrains from any animosity toward Jews, despite the Israeli occupation.

"Every religion should respect the other – Christians, Muslims and Jews."

But he worries, "If we do not get our rights, we will likely stay enemies."

International law seems to be on his side, Beinin said.

"International law requires that refugees return to their homes. There will be no deal unless all the Golan is returned, in which case the Syrian refugees will go back and the Israeli settlements will be evacuated and the settlers relocated in Israel."

Beinin says any lasting peace agreement requires a full Israeli withdrawal and a full Israeli-Syrian peace.

"Just as was the case with Egypt. No more, no less," he said.

Kanshaw points out, "Look at how much money is spent on war. If it is instead put to peace, then everyone will prosper."

"Humans are humans wherever they are. We do not hate," he said.

 Source: Al Jazeera
Feedback Number of comments : 17
 
Ria
Thailand
02/09/2008
yearning for golan, yearning for peace
It is enlightening to hear the the forced refugees are optimistic about peace negotiations. One would assume that, after the emotional tormet they have been through, hate would be their only agenda. I think the Israeli government really needs to begin realising that their continued efforts to procure land will only arouse more hatred within both Israeli and Palestinian parties and will ultimately result in them moving further and further away from a lasting agreement.

Unknown
South Africa
03/09/2008
There is a consequence to War
On the one hand it is always interesting to read about the thoughts and desires of varying refugees regarding their right of return from the 1967 War, however through all the reporting I have ever red one fails to mention that the Arabs waged war in 67 on Israel in an attempt to demolish them, ignoring the right of a State created by the UN. The consequences of this war were refugees and lose of land. If peace is to be made one needs to remember that and take responsibilty for it.

skywalker
Canada
04/09/2008
yearning for Golan
Israel has never known peace and has no interest in peace. In fact it is afraid of it. Israel is the number one terrorist and being supported by the USA there cannot possibly be a bigger one ever. Most people have no idea what the occupation means because they have not been to the territories and experienced it themselves. Go observe the terrible deeds the IDF performs on civilians and you will have a new understanding of what real terrorism is all about.

aLo
Israel
04/09/2008
to the one from switzerland
do you know history? in 1967 there was NO OCCUPIED TERRITORIES...gaza was egypts and west bank was jordan's. Israel was just what the palestinians want it to be today....the war started because egypt and syria wanted to invade israel to WIPE IT OUT! and settle the WHOLE ISRAELI TERRITORIES with arab palestinians! sorry, we couldn't let that happen..and we occupied the lands from egypt and jordan, who ruled them...not from palestinians !

liebe
Kenya
04/09/2008
israel 2 dive back golan heights
Sounds 2 good,i am skeptic,and will be more if i was a jew.if arabs on the high ground above decide 2 pound the israelis below( after syiria is given them back),jews have themselves 2 blame.?quarantee can the arabs give2 israelis 4 their safety &peace.is there a good basis 4 jews 2 trust the arabs now?be realistic pse,if u a jew living below, will u make such noise now?like what a am reading about giving land 2 arabs,so u can turn 2 be a refugee in their place?

rezasantorini
United States
06/09/2008
Golan Heights
Many Israelis were attacked from the Golan...the elevation made this possible. It made them easy marks. Of course Israel was going to want to stop that. What will stop the Syrians from doing it again? Yes, it is beautiful. It still is. When visiting I always bring candy from the UN for all the soldiers..both sides. Sometimes they are afraid to eat it, but eventually, they do. They are young and so beautiful...

Miche Norman
Israel
06/09/2008
When will peace come
If peace can only come aftrer Bush and Olmert, because they do not represent their people, then perhaps it can only come after Assad who received his kingdom as an inheritance, followed by an election as convinving as those in Zimbabwe. He wants the Golan, he wants relations with the west, but he has to realise that a first step is complying with 1701, stopping arming chi-zvala, and talking peace, not peace like with ?Egypt, which is essentially not war, but real peace.

Miche Norman
Israel
06/09/2008
1973
Interesting comment on the Syrian "victory" in 1973, They attacked on our holiest day with overwhelming superiority in arms, and ended up the war pushed back beyond the purple line with Damascus within range of our artillery. Since then they have used proxies to attack us because they know the limits of their power. Before 67 they used the Golan to bombard Northern Israel, the talks failed in the 90s because of ridiculous Syrian demands, now they have a lot of convincing to do

Unknown
Switzerland
03/09/2008
The true source of war
It is very narrow minded to hint on the ones who begann the war 1967 and at the same time not to mention that this war was led to free the occupied territories and to help the people of palestine that have suffered under the zionist occupation and never ending terror. If one tries to make an analytical statement, than one should do the job correctly and admit where injustice has startet and who is still suffering under the consequences of zionist state terrorism.

Paul
Ukraine
03/09/2008
Yearning for Golan
Anyone who has read anything about the formation of the state of Israel from what was once known as Palestine should completely dismiss as nonsense talk of 'Zionist state terrorism'. "Unknown' from Switzerland, do some reading and save your hate for those who propagate hate rather than spouting tired old propaganda about why peace remains elusive in the Middle East. You contribute nothing to this discussion

yaakov
United States
04/09/2008
Justice
Give all of the Golan back to the Syrians for peace. Only compromise will make for a real peace.

Benjmin
Canada
07/09/2008
Miche Norman is Brain Washed
Quoting Yitzhak Rabin"I do not believe that Nasser wanted war,The 2 divisions he sent into Sanai would not have been enough to unleash an offensive against Israel.He knew it and we knew it"Arab leaders are infamous for their big talk and lack of action.At no time has Israel ever been under real threat of annihilation.What people like Miche need to do, is go back in history and truely understand the roots of the problems we face today.We've grown tiered of the manipulated facts & stubborn retoric

Aeschylus
Greece
04/09/2008
seeking pease, yearning for Golan
I did not quite understand Paul`s comment. I thought it was generally accepted that in the year 1948, the founding of the state of Israel was based on the seize and occupation of the palestinian part of the land, as defined by the UN decisions, as well as the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people, who had to become refugees in Gasa, the West Bank and the Arab States. So which part of these opposes to the definition "Zionist state terrorism"?

TOME
Syria
04/09/2008
GOLAN
Going by history, I don't support Israel handing over the CAPTURED territories to their acclaimed original owners. What if the Arab Nations had succeeded in wiping away Israel in 1967? Moreover, Israel did not inherit those lands from Palestine, rather from other neighboring Nations who failed to win the war. I guess the Palestinians should attack their Arab brothers for putting them into this BIG ***, and not Israel. The conditions for the war has to be followed. UN is aware of this. Xdwm

Benjmin
Canada
04/09/2008
It should be noted that Isreal and not the arabs initiated the war of 67.The fact that Isreal won the war does not negate it from its responsibility towards the original inhabitants of the land.Unfortunatley for all Israels cheerleaders,the land comes with its people and under no condition is subdueing the native population under suprressive conditions permissible nor is it the wining parties right to ethnicaly cleanse the land because its people are of the wronge religion.That would is genocide

Miche Norman
Israel
06/09/2008
Benjamin is confused
Look in the History books, the IDF did not parade through Cairo and Damascus calling for the destruction of the enemy, we did not enforce a naval blockade,that was the troops loyal to Nasser and to whoever the Syrian dictator was at the time. We even sent a message to Hussein saying that if he remained neutral then there would be no war with Jordan. Look at any Arab Newspaper from mid may onwards in 1967. This was a war forced on us by Arab leaders who did not care about their troops or people

tom carlisle
United States
03/04/2009
Israel does it again
Sounds good, but my bet is that Israel will never give up this territory after putting so many settlers on it. The I dea is that Israel wants all of the territory it now occupies. They will milk this for all of the propaganda value they can particularly in the US kill any actual treaty and blame it on their neighbors not wanting peace or they will simply use the talks for a smoke screen while they kill more innocent Palestinians when they think the world is watching something else. Wait and see.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article