UPDATED ON:
Monday, July 14, 2008
11:24 Mecca time, 08:24 GMT
FOCUS ANALYSIS
Analysis: Blame the dollar

The US economy has been on the verge of recession as it combats a massive national debt, a housing crisis and the declining strength of the dollar [GALLO/GETTY]

The US economic power horse is running out of ideas and cash as it jostles with a massive national debt, housing and financial crises, rising inflation, and a depreciating currency.

This has all contributed to a growing tendency to live off credit amassed through petrodollars and foreign loans, leaving repayment for future generations.

Today, in much of America, communities and suburbs are dealing with a drastic increase in foreclosures and short sales. This has not been helped by the fact that gas is selling at over $1 a litre ($4 a gallon).

Standard monetary tools such as lowering or increasing interest rates can no longer provide quick fixes to the situation for both economic and political reasons.

Raising interest rates would compound the mortgage crisis while lowering it would drive the value of the US dollar abroad even lower.

But exercising control over the money supply could also damage the US economy: increasing the supply would lower the dollar's value even more, while decreasing supply would exacerbate the loans crisis.

In any case, control over the money supply would be anathema to US economic policy given the country's 'addiction' to deficit financing and run-away consumerism in recent decades.

So the US Federal Reserve is left virtually helpless.

It has, however, tried to help Wall Street by becoming a temporary lender and allow many investment firms the opportunity to avoid bankruptcy. Such an action by the Fed has not happened since the stock market fiascos in the 1930s.

The US government, however, can apply one clear fix to the situation - cut back overspending on a massive scale.

But this option too is off the table in an election year where 'victory' is being promised in endless wars on 'terrorism'.

And it is the recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that have contributed the lion's share to sapping America's resources.

Plunge of the dollar 

Increased energy demands from developing nations fuelled a rise in oil prices [EPA]
As America struggles to avoid recession, the world economic order appears to be heading for a drastic overhaul. 

Despite a trend by some economists and politicians to blame the current food and energy commodity price hikes on Opec or overpopulation, there is a clear picture emerging of deep structural problems in the world economy.

In particular, the main currency used for global trade in commodities, the US dollar, has been in steady decline not just against the Euro, but also against most other convertible currencies.

According to the US Federal Reserve, the dollar has dropped by around 65 per cent against the Euro, 31 per cent against the British Sterling, 45 per cent against the Canadian Dollar, and by 59 per cent against the Australian Dollar over the eight-year period since June 2000. 

While the causes for this slide are debatable (and largely attributed to poor fundamentals in the US economy), the global impact of such a major drop in the value of the dollar is undeniable for two important reasons.  

First, most global commodities traders utilise - and favour - the greenback over other currencies, despite a severe decline in its purchasing power.

Secondly, most countries - mainly in east Asia and among the major oil and gas exporters of the Arab Middle East - use the dollar as their reserve currency.

But they are paying the price. Despite their booming economies and elevated public spending, they are experiencing depreciating terms of trade and rising inflation.

More importantly, they have seen the value of their strategic currency reserves drop with the dollar's waning global strength.

Rising prosperity 

The situation is ironically exacerbated by a significant rise in prosperity and consequently in the volume of global trade in recent years.

According to a 2007 Handbook of Statistics published by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (Unctad), global merchandise export and import volumes have grown at over 10 per cent a year over the 45-year period 1960-2005 in US dollar terms and based on current prices. 

After the economic shocks of 1998 (caused by the Asian financial crisis of the time) and 2001 (following the terrorist attacks on 9/11), export and import growth rates for world merchandise accelerated to almost 17 per cent a year between 2003 and 2006.  

Such a huge rise in demand for commodities would inevitably result in inflationary pressure on prices, particularly when the currency used for transactions - the dollar - is consistently losing its underlying value. 

Global revolution

Related articles


 
Q&A: Oil prices and the economy

Starbucks to close 600 outlets

Fed chief optimistic on economy

US jobless figures rise

Recession warning by US Fed chief
Furthermore, there has been significant and robust growth in the economies of developing countries in the past half century.

Developing country export growth outpaced the global average rate by 1 per cent in the 1960-2005 period, and outpaced the developed world by 1.2 per cent over the same period, according to Unctad.

And the differential between developing (including India, China, UAE) and developed nations (such as Japan, US, France, Germany, UK) has increased with time: 1.4 per cent for 1970-2005; 1.4 per cent for 1980-2005; 3.6 per cent for 1990-2005; and 4.8 per cent for the period 2000-2005.  

The fall of the Soviet Union and its satellites is also adding to growing market demands and the push for prosperity

Former Warsaw Pact countries, which are now known as 'economies in transition', have in recent years outpaced developing countries' export growth rates by close to 6 per cent over 2000-2005, according to UNCTAD.

This has changed the economic dynamic of north-south and east-west dialogue. Some 50 years ago, 80 per cent of the world's population lived in low-income countries. Today, that proportion has been turned on its head with four billion - around 65 per cent - living in middle and high-income countries.  

What we now have in effect is a quiet global revolution beginning to bear fruit following a 50-year period shift in economic foci and decolonisation.

The impact of decolonisation is not to be underestimated. Those 'peripheral' areas of the world - such as India and China - exploited for centuries by a self-serving 'metropolis' have developed a self-consciousness emanating from a technological, economic and political revolution.  

Dumping the dollar 

The growth of global economies - some of which had not been international players until recently - creates a proportional need for energy and food resources and consequently the crises we face today.

As the crises that emanate from growing prosperity develop, they fuel a hunger for increased commodity production, a reduction in waste, and an urgent need to locate alternative energy sources.

However, there is also a need to take immediate measures to protect the growth in global prosperity.

World leaders, particularly among major oil and gas producers and those in East Asia and elsewhere with large foreign currency reserves, are coming under pressure to ditch one of the greatest causes of global inflation today -the fast-declining US dollar.

Though many have been resistant to this idea, sooner or later economic realities will overcome political interests that negate its rationale.  

Iran has spearheaded this idea with its own Oil Bourse that trades mainly in Euros and Yen, and by converting its reserves to other currencies.

While Iran is already reaping the benefits of these moves, it however lacks the financial muscle to make a real dent in world trade trends.  

The country that is most likely to realise this idea with both impact and impunity - and has some outstanding scores to settle with the US - is Russia.

Mother Russia?

Will Russia use its military and economic muscle to dump the dollar? [AFP]
Why would Russia continue to amass a rapidly deteriorating currency in its reserves at a time when its own economy is stronger than most others? Why indeed would any country want to continue trading in a currency that harms its terms of trade? 

The slightest hint of a move by Russia to ditch the dollar substantially would fuel speculation by a number of unstoppably powerful agents: national central banks, currency speculators and those same global corporations that emanated from the West.

They would not betray their profit motive if greater profitability is achieved through trading in other currencies. Even the consistently timid Arab oil exporters would join the fray once a trend is started.  

Ironically, the inevitable dumping of the US Dollar is not such good news for the EU in the long run, as the continuing rise of the Euro is detrimental for the continent's exports, and will weaken European manufacturing almost as rapidly as the Euro's rise.

Furthermore, reliance on the services sector is no solution either, as rising global prices coupled with the rise of the Euro reduce demand for luxuries-oriented European goods and services - such as designer goods and tourism - even harder. 

For these reasons, it is prudent to concentrate on the use of other currencies too.

A positive outcome 

We are witnessing the birth pangs of a new, more equal world economic order with the particularly notable rise of Asia (but not just Asia) and with Russia as its most likely midwife.

Despite short-term difficulties ahead, there are good reasons for optimism since greater economic equality leads to a greater rule of law, dialogue, respect and cooperation among nations.

To borrow a classic liberal axiom: greater economic equality leads to greater democracy and the rule of law. This holds as much among more equal nations as it does for individuals 'competing freely' in a market.

By extension, we can also add that greater economic equality among nations would lead to greater international dialogue, respect and cooperation in the conduct of international relations.

This should also more successfully reduce the support base for extremism and fundamentalism in the West and the East. 

Massoud Hedeshi is an international development consultant.

 Source: Al Jazeera
 
Topics in this article
Country

Feedback Number of comments : 45
 
cloudy
Afghanistan
10/07/2008
Good Article
You certainly should write more! I think think we are lacking some fresh perspectives such as yours on the situation with the dollar and that there may be a silver lining after all to this overhyped gloomy forecast

Nick Bowman
United Kingdom
10/07/2008
Your article
One of the most interesting and well-thought through articles I've read in a long time...well structured and convincingly argued. And most importantly very uplifting for anyone who believes that a change in the world order is for the good.

T.Foster
Afghanistan
10/07/2008
Declining dollar
An excellent article graphically displaying the difficulties ahead for the US dominated money markets but also showing that there is a way out of this US-fuelled quandry. The author should write more.I look forward to this event.

X
Germany
10/07/2008
WHILE THE ARTICLE WAS INFORMATIVE. YOUR OPINION AT THE END IS JUST SUPPORTING AND PROMOTING THE NEW WORLD ORDER - WE WILL ALL BE SLAVES TO ONE GOVERNMENT, IF THIS HAPPENS

Calum Coburn
Australia
11/07/2008
World Economic Order
'World Economic Order' at first reminded me of the dreaded nightmare 'New World Order'. Sound arguement, would be useful (long term) if the Chinese Yuan were to float freely.

kd
United States
11/07/2008
What an insightful and concise sweep of past, present, and future. Thank you.

Ben
United States
11/07/2008
Theres always a pessimest...
Play out a simulation where equality between many nations surfaces. I just can not see an outcome that does not lead to massive wars. There must always be a definitive 'head', or else some aggressive and charismatic fool will always try.

Ben
United States
11/07/2008
Theres always a pessimest...
Play out a simulation where equality between many nations surfaces. I just can not see an outcome that does not lead to massive wars. There must always be a definitive 'head', or else some aggressive and charismatic fool will always do so by force.

hUSSEIN
Tanzania
11/07/2008
Analysis By Massoud Heeshi
A very interesting article that has given us the food for thought! So after all Iran made a smart move! May be that is the reason of the hostility of US towards Iran?

John Norris
United States
12/07/2008
Wow, great news: "around 65 per cent - living in middle and high-income countries." Oh, bad news: If more are prosperous and US is less influential, then leaders of under-performing governments are going to have to find someone else to blame.

Derek
Canada
12/07/2008
Analysis: Blame the dollar
Has it occurred to anyone else that the US gains by borrowing so massively from everyone else, and then paying them back with money that purchases about half the goods it did when borrowed 8 years ago (and they get to keep the goods)?

Francisco
Puerto Rico
12/07/2008
Great article, A different perspective well put.

Najla
Korea (South)
16/07/2008
Massoud, I am proud of u
Look at all these e-mails. Wow, u r a great writer. I have always told u that. Do it more often. Write ur own book.

kj
Afghanistan
17/07/2008
"deficits dont matter"
crooked bush/cheney and accomplices greenspan/hedge fund john paulson expected to revive the economy on the backs of the foolish and ignorant in their cheap money subprime fiasco. foreign paper holders got screwed too. wars financed back on taxpayers.

Victor
United States
19/07/2008
Super!!
What would say Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton about this mess which has made by the last "brilliant" presidents" They could tell them, "your stupidity has been killing this great nation" Once upon a time US was a great nation carrying our CREED around the world. Now, we are not what we used to be anymore

john j
Australia
23/07/2008
$136/bushell
The US taxpayer heavily subsidises all grains (including corn) in America.I think it is over $20 billion /year. Even if the US sold its grain for $136/bushell it would still be losing money.

salah aldin
Palestinian Territory
24/07/2008
dollars lost
this is the best news i heard in my life americian thinks that they will always be the strongest in the world but one day they will lose everything if they dont think smart and stop the wars.

Niall Wijetunge
United Kingdom
27/07/2008
Everything you say is correct but...
I'm not sure we can be as optimistic to think several big players sharing power instead of just the US bodes well for the world. The UN Security Council has enough problems obtaining a consensus without having more players getting involved. I want more equality but we need a revised global apparatus & spirit of cooperation to forge a sustainable global economy. With so much expected compeitition for water, oil etc.., I can only hope the quality of politicians gets better.

yusuf
South Africa
10/07/2008
Blame The Dollar
Excellent assessment. Makes a lot of sense and explains some of the actions of USA - eg animosity to Iran

Steven
United States
10/07/2008
dropping the US dollar
Thanks for this article. While it's hard on the US right now, in the long run it will help us regain control of our country and re-enter the world as a partner. And, while it's unpopular to say, it has been the US that has, more than any other country, contributed to this present situation - rebuilding eruope and asia after WWII, championing equality world-wide, and pushing world-wide trade. We've messed up many times - Vietnam, Cuba. I look forward to being a world-citizen again. Regards.

ROBERT SIMMERS
United States
10/07/2008
BLAME THE DOLLAR
Gee, do you mean it is possible that things might actually get better in the world if the U.S. is not in charge ? Funny, I haven't heard anything along that line from any of our current or wannabe political leaders here in America. Excellent article. Very objective, well articulated and optimistic. Thank you.

Fouad
Netherlands
11/07/2008
The Dollar
What amazes me is that most US citizens still don't understand or even want to understand the threat of overspending. They are firmly entrenched in the idea's that the US economy is almighty and that the US has the right to use force to gain access to markets and resources (Clinton testomony to Congres). It's good to see the US decline as a major power in order so that a more (hopefully) 'stable' and 'balanced' world can arise in which not one but many powers hold eachother at bay.

mike
United States
11/07/2008
solution
Another thing we could also do is raise the price of our crops that are exported instead of dropping or keeping them the same price. As oil and other resources go up in price it takes more from the farmers to harvest and run their machinery. So raise the price of the grain we send to other nations to include OPEC. $136 for barre lof oil, $136 for bushel of grain.

Dan
United States
11/07/2008
We could use the rest
Don't think for a minute that we American's wouldn't love a break from having to separate the world from your never ending wars of ideology and conquest. For more than 100 years we've emptied our treasury to defend the world from Nazism, Communism, Fascism, Maoism, Libearation theology, Colonialism, and now we have exhuasted our treasury and spilled our young people's blood having to defend you all from the scourge of Taqfirism and ethnic cleansing. The average American would love to come home.

Chris
Sweden
11/07/2008
Funny
What amazes me is that so many people feel that an article is 'objective' just because it supports their believes.

Najla Z. Al-Sakkaf
Korea (South)
11/07/2008
Blame the dollar
Very interesting ideas and thoughts. It is very refreshing to hear your opinion which argues and explores every possible options and from different angle s and perspective. I also liked the optimism tone....We certainly need hope. And that's a realistic hope. Way to go and please keep on writing

H
United States
11/07/2008
Blame the dollar
I would like to clarify that the US's problems now are not related to sovereign debt, but its citizens' debt. That is a problem the US has yet to confront. Also, the countries with large amounts of dollars face a catch-22 in the decision to dump their holdings. Letting all those dollars on the market would lead to huge losses for those countries and certainly not help the US which accounts for roughly 20% of the world's GDP. (and thus be another sore spot for those countries)

Brian
United States
11/07/2008
Global Expansion of Free Trade
has resulted in geopolitical economic warfare being waged, and as a result the US is loosing as the dollar plumets.

Felix M.
United States
12/07/2008
$136.00
Mike from the USA, sounds like a great idea. If oil is $136 then grain should be equivalent in price. Hostile countries to the USA are using the price of oil against us so we should reciprocate.

Terry
Canada
13/07/2008
Do you have any idea what the U S national debt is and what it would be per capita?

Alex Nelson
Canada
13/07/2008
Blame the dollar
We talk about this at York University in Toronto all the time and you are right, the American dollar is in crisis and sooner or later the world might stop using the greenback as its most popular currency. Even though I'm American, im no fool and no its time for a change and the majority of the world needs to enjoy prosperity too and the depreciating dollar may be one of the catalysts propelling developing nations towards prosperity with the fall of the dollar as a world currency.

Donulvi Dolam
Australia
13/07/2008
Blame the development consultant
Who is the brainless idiot that allowed a development consultant to write about money. It he new what he was talking about he would realize that the US dollar is been purposely kept low to damage the investments of certain countries not friendly to America. With an economy of 300 million participants and a further 1.5 billion others on the outside of its borders, nothing can hurt the US economy unless the US deems it necessary for its own interests.

Najla
Korea (South)
13/07/2008
Weak Dollar
Dan,do not only take a break fm trying 2 fix our part of the world,but rather get out of it.The US is only ruining everything fm economy,culture 2 peace&political stability and exploiting our national resources.But that comes with a price which you started to pay.Flix,oil crises is only a reminder that the super power US is still dependent on other nations' wealth.That's how business runs in today's globalized world.Keep the bushel of grain to yourself,there are new emerging powers interested in

Dennis
Afghanistan
13/07/2008
Great article
Insightfully written article. My compliments to the writer. A balance in power is definitly needed in this world. Centralisme for that case should be avoided. Real democracy can be nurished better from the roots I think. So more power to the local authorities, expecially in international decisionmaking. Maybe special referendums in important changes such as: going to war, starting a new constitution (europe), using new valuta. Information freedom in this matter so people can choose better

dee
Greece
13/07/2008
Najla from south korea, thank you for talking sense! :) Donulvi from australia, I would like to ask you how 'friendly' has America been to the countries it has done business with? You seem to lack the understanding that there has been NO respect toward the human dignity of the peoples in third world countries where US and EU corporations are based......please look into that.

Mark Kraft
United States
14/07/2008
...but can the rest of the world afford growing economies?
I am hardly a U. S. citizen who views our country as somehow having a right to dominance, but you have to consider... can the rest of the world really afford to aspire to our standard of living, or is that a guarantee of fullscale global warming, with the destruction of the world's snowpacks and widescale drought worldwide? The world cannot afford to afford a US standard of living. Clearly, a new standard is needed.

Tuma
United States
14/07/2008
dont just blame the dollar
One of the main causes for the free-fall of the dollar in the last decade has been our incessant borrowing. But think about this- we borrow that money to buy imports, meaning that if we stop borrowing, we stop shopping. If we stop shopping, a good half of the Asian export economy grinds to a halt. YOU don't want that. And Najla, you're using the INTERNET - an AMERICAN invention. Airplanes? MTV? 95% of the greatest movies and records of all time? Much of the world's FOOD? Products of the USA.

David
New Zealand (Aotearoa)
14/07/2008
Bush bad, America good.
Overspending in the US is not the problem. The extension of cheap credit to people throughout the Anglo-Saxon world to sustain consumer spending, in lieu of higher real wages, that's the problem. To those who want to see a weaker role for the US in the world - it's better to be Canada than Tibet, if you get my drift.

Najla
Korea (South)
14/07/2008
There is a world out there, America!
Tuma,there is a world out there that you need to recognize and respect. Cultures,food,style,etc.and no,not every one is dependent or a fan of your products!Who eats American food in France or India??The reality the most Americans cant see is that perhaps the other nations do not have your super marketing and advertising machine but believe it or not statistics show that majority of people do not know anything about internet,airplanes,MTV,food&movies!&they do not care much about them.

Lindsay
United States
15/07/2008
Great Article, excellent analysis…
I would like to point out to 'dee' from Greece that China trades and invests in countries who completely ignore human rights standards. Sudan, has snubbed Western threats and sanctions over the continuing atrocities in Darfur, thanks in large part to China's readiness to scoop up its resources. While the US and EU are certainly not innocent, the country most widely known to overlook human rights is quickly becoming one of the world’s largest economic presence.

mohamed nasrudeen
India
16/07/2008
block point
now the world economic stability has been deepend up on in not only with americons but allso americon dollers as well as his bad politicol and economical rules has afecting all the rising countrys we all other americon countres should have thing thiss so we should take action for undepend americon economic policy

Ken B
Afghanistan
17/07/2008
excellent article
I found this article to be very timely and significant. Thank you for your contribution to economic dialog that currently does not exist in the U.S. during these troubled economic times. Unfortunatly most Americans are not made aware of the global economic position of our nation. I wish more average American citizens read from this news source. Excellent!

G Wooden
United States
02/09/2008
Your Article
While I agree that the US is suffering from some major internal financial corrections and some fundamental shifts in world power as other nations rise in influence and prosperity (partially from the US exporting it's wealth to other nations via energy and product purchases). I cannot agree with the conclusion that 'greater economic equality leads to greater democracy and rule of law.' How can you assume that Saudia Arabia would be more democratic if say Egypt and Libya had equal wealth?

cdoc
United States
19/09/2008
Blame the dollar
I enjoyed the article but do not see the two main outcomes as realistic. Russia is a country with a deadly combination of societal, economic and governmental ills that make it poorly suited to being a leader. Even with it's vast energy wealth, it's stock market and currency are failing terribly. Add the reluctance of foreign companies to invest in an increasingly authoritarian market and it seems likely to become less and less attractive. Reference to fundamentalism is rather unsupportable

saami
United Arab Emirates
04/12/2008
grain for petrol
Mike & Felix. Your idea of equal price for petrol and your grain may seem smart to many of you. let me remind you, in middle east we dont eat your grain....maybe some grain is imported here is just for the reason to make your leaders happy. US products has been bycotted by moslems ...atleast 70% moslems does so. Since last four years i havent bought anything that could benefit US and indirectly Israel

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article
Aljazeera.net/english 2003 - 2010 ©
Designed & Developed by Aljazeera IT