UPDATED ON:
Sunday, July 20, 2008
02:24 Mecca time, 23:24 GMT
 
FOCUS: COMMENTARY: 60 YEARS OF DIVISION
The fall of an Arab town in 1948
 By Sandy Tolan, Middle East author and journalist

David Ben-Gurion declares the state of Israel on May 14, 1948 in this file photo [GALLO/GETTY]

On the evening of July 11, 1948, in the town of al-Ramla on the coastal plain of Palestine, the sons and daughters of the town patriarch huddled together in the family compound.

There was flour in the storehouse, enough for a few days' supply of bread, if the family chose to hold out a little longer. 

But enemy forces were drawing closer. Even for Sheikh Mustafa al-Khairi, head of one of the "notable" families of al-Ramla, the inevitable could not be delayed much longer. 

The shutters were drawn tight against the sound of nearby explosions.

And now there was news of an Israeli infantry assault on the nearby town of Lydda, a few miles to the southeast, where scores of Palestinians were reported killed.

One American correspondent would write, "the corpses of Arab men, women and even children [were] strewn about in the wake of the ruthlessly brilliant charge."

Surrender

Sheikh Mustafa, until recently the mayor of al-Ramla, had to make a decision from the family's shuttered room. Word of the carnage had reached the shelters of al-Ramla, where Dr Rasem Khairi, Sheikh Mustafa's nephew, was tending to the wounded in his makeshift shelter.

That evening, shortly after Arab-run Radio Jerusalem broadcast a recording of Beethoven's First Symphony, the few Arab forces pledged to defend the town abandoned their posts in al-Ramla, melting into the plains to fight another day in another place. 

Al-Ramla was left in the hands of its young Arab defenders who were armed with some old rifles and crude rockets they launched from the branches of trees.

Sheikh Mustafa knew enemy forces would soon arrive to repeat the assault on Lydda. He realised that the unthinkable had become the only choice. He ordered his son, Husam, with other prominent families, to ride to the nearby Jewish kibbutz of Na'an, to sign a document whose name the family dared not speak: surrender.

The surrender, occupation and ultimate expulsion of the Arab residents of al-Ramla, along with the more brutal assault and expulsion of Lydda, were part of the Israeli military's Operation Dani of July 1948.

For Palestinians, those days lie at the heart of the collective memory of the Nakba, or Catastrophe, 60 years later.

The events of mid-July 1948 show that, unlike traditional accounts by Israel and those conveyed to many Americans, Arabs did not leave their homes willingly or in order to make way for avenging Arab armies, but were, in many cases, driven from their homes as part of a co-ordinated plan by leaders of the Jewish state.

Remove the 'obstacle'

Israeli militias attacked Arab towns before Operation Dani's launch in 1948 [GETTY]
Documents of Operation Dani unearthed from Israeli state and local kibbutz archives, and the writings of Israeli military commanders in al-Ramla and Lydda in July 1948, demonstrate beyond doubt that the expulsions from the two towns were part of a military plan, in part to remove the "obstacle" of an Arab population on the main route between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. 

(Zionist leaders had long spoken of securing the road from attacks from on Jewish convoys.)

Yitzhak Rabin, the late Israeli prime minister who was an army major during Operation Dani, wrote that David Ben-Gurion, the Zionist leader and first Israeli prime minister, ordered the expulsions. 

Rabin's commander, Yigal Allon, described the military advantages of those expulsions in a 1948 Israeli military journal.  And a Na'an kibbutz leader, Israel Galili B, who, like some other early Israelis had opposed the expulsions, wrote that Ben-Gurion had ordered the Israeli soldiers to "evacuate al-Ramla".

For the Khairis – and for tens of thousands of Palestinians in the towns of al-Ramla and Lydda – the brutal shock of mid-July 1948 was in stark contrast to the hope and defiance that marked the Arab rejection of the UN partition plan scarcely seven months earlier. 

Though al-Ramla and Lydda would have stayed on the "Arab side" in a two-state partition, just a few kilometres from the Jewish state, Palestinian Arabs did not want separate Arab and Jewish states: They wanted one state for all, and declared their willingness to fight for it.

Zionist leaders, including Ben-Gurion, had embraced the plan publicly, though he would worry in private about the Arab minority, which made up at least 45 per cent of the outlined Jewish state. 

"With such a composition," he told a group of Jewish labour leaders a month after the UN vote, "there can be no absolute certainty that control will remain in the hands of the Jewish majority."

Needed, Ben-Gurion declared, was "a new approach ... new habits of mind to suit our new future. We must think like a state."

Plan: Eretz-Yisrael

Members of the Israeli Haganah forces plan a raid [GALLO/GETTY]

Less than three months later, Zionist strategists meeting in Tel Aviv designed Plan D – "a secret plan", according to a prominent Israeli historian.

It was "the final phase of which would be all of Eretz-Yisrael" – meaning, the conquest of both the Arab and Jewish sides of the partition.

The Plan D blueprint, drawn up on March 10, 1948, declared itself defensive in nature: it was "not an operation of occupation outside the borders of the Hebrew state."

But it called for "aiming control of the areas of Jewish settlement and concentration which are located outside the borders", and for occupation of "enemy bases lying directly close to the borders which may be used as springboards for infiltration into the territory of the state."

Among the tactics Plan D outlined: "Destruction of villages (setting fire to, blowing up, and planting mines in the debris), especially those population centres which are difficult to control continuously."

In April 1948, the Khairi home in al-Ramla was jolted by a series of blasts coming from the edge of town. The headquarters of Hassan Salameh, one of the key commanders charged with defending the town, had been blown up. The commander survived, but 17 of his men did not.

Just as the Khairis and their neighbours began wondering if their town could withstand more attacks, now came two more devastating pieces of news:  Adb al-Qader al-Husseini, the Palestinians' most revered commander, had been killed in the battle for Qastal, near Jerusalem.

And on the same day, the Jewish militia known as the Stern Gang, aided by Irgun, massacred more than 125 unarmed men, women and children in the village of Deir Yassin.

Three days later, Arabs attacked a Jewish convoy on the road to the Hadassah Hospital in a retaliation massacre, killing at least 78, mostly doctors and nurses.

Deir Yassin's terror

Related Articles

Tracing Gaza's Chaos to 1948

The Nakba: Catalyst for pan-Arabism

Opinion: Arabism's greatest loss

Realising the Zionist dream

Why the Arabs were defeated

Profile: King Abdullah I of Jordan

The Deir Yassin massacre, more than any other single event, sent waves of fear across Arab Palestine; many families began to flee their villages, especially in the wake of "whispering campaigns", some organised by Yigal Allon, of impending attacks by Jewish forces.

As the result of one such campaign, the Arab village of Na'ani was abandoned, and many of the villagers took refuge on the streets of al-Ramla.

On May 15, the day after David Ben-Gurion declared Israel's statehood, the war officially began, as neighbouring Arab states joined the battle. 

What Israel considered attempts by the Arabs to wipe it off the map, Palestinian villagers saw as an attempt to save them from living as a minority in an alien state. That same day, the Irgun began a series of attacks on al-Ramla.

The town's local defenders lay behind sandbags in shallow drenches they had dug with oxen and hand tools. "The whole city," an Israeli newspaper would recount, "became one big battlefield." 

On May 19, the attacks were finally repulsed. But the spectre of the Irgun penetrating the town's defences had evoked fears of another Deir Yassin-like massacre.

As Dr Rasem Khairi bandaged wounded fighters in his makeshift clinic, Khairi elders made plans to send their children to safety in the nearby Christian hill town of Ramallah. They assumed it would be for just a short time.

Ill-equipped, barefoot

Fact file: Sir John Glubb

Sir John Glubb Pasha (1897-1986), also known as Glubb Pasha, was a British general best known for commanding the Transjordan Arab Legion between 1939 and 1956.

He is credited with transforming the Arab Legion into one of the strongest armies in the Arab world.

In 1956, King Hussein of Jordan sacked Glubb Pasha as part of his efforts to solidify his status in the Arab world.

In al-Ramla, the Khairis watched as the situation went from bad to worse.

In late May, commander Hassan Salameh himself was killed, and his fighters, leaderless, drifted away. 

Now the defence of the town was left largely to barefoot Bedouins sent by King Abdullah of Transjordan, whose main objective was not to confront Israel, but to capture the West Bank for his Hashemite kingdom. 

The members of the ill-equipped, ill-humoured "barefoot brigade" would be remembered for their bravery and for their hunger: they often used their rifles to shoot pigeons for food.

But they would be no match for the Israeli forces, which, during a June ceasefire, had managed to break a UN arms embargo and smuggle in fighter planes, tanks, rifles, and millions of rounds of ammunition. 

The Arab side, under the influence of the British, had adhered to the embargo, and thus King Abdullah's fighters, at the end of the ceasefire, found themselves almost out of bullets. 

"How are we to fight without ammunition?" the commander of King Abdullah's Arab Legion, Glubb Pasha, asked Transjordan's prime minister.

"Don't shoot," came the reply, "unless the Jews shoot first."

And so it was that two days after the end of the ceasefire, on July 11, 1948, the battle-hardened Jewish army stormed the town of Lydda, easily overwhelming their ragtag forces, and marching inexorably toward al-Ramla. 

For Sheikh Mustafa, there was no choice but to send his son to the nearby kibbutz to surrender. 

He did so on the evening on July 11. The surrender document declares that the Arab residents of the town could choose to leave, "if they want to"; implicit, and understood by parties from both sides who signed the agreement, was that the Arabs could also choose to stay.

Quickly, the people of al-Ramla learned of a new reality. On July 12, Israeli soldiers began pounding on doors with the butts of their guns, shouting through bullhorns, "Yallah Abdullah!  Go to Abdullah, go to Ramallah!"

The residents of al-Ramla and Lydda were being expelled by force of arms.

Sandy Tolan is the author of The Lemon Tree:  An Arab, A Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East, from which this account is drawn.  He is associate professor of journalism at the Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California.

 Source: Al Jazeera
Feedback Number of comments : 58
 
Zethu Sibiya
Swaziland
12/07/2008
the fall of an arab town in 1948
Thank you for info that will bring so much insight into one of the most underplayed issues.

Saul Pati
Vanuatu
12/07/2008
Good stuff...howver they will re-claim all the lands that belong to them

Marcos Camargo
Brazil
13/07/2008
Nakba
The Lemon Tree: An Arab, A Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East, is a very interesting and different vue of the conflict as we know it. Two questions: has this book an english version? If so, how can it be acquired? Thanks for your attention,

Larry
United States
13/07/2008
A simple way of measuring the health of a society is ask: what do they teach their children and how do they treat fellow citizens with dissenting views.

Michael Kavodi
Canada
15/07/2008
Liberation of our land
The land of Israel was given to the Jews by the almighty, blessed be he. What happened in 1948 was the almighty's way of restoring the land to its rightful owners. The Arabs of Israel, are free to live in any one of about 22 Arab nations.

Danon
Canada
15/07/2008
What is the truth?
Were the Jews removed from this land by the occupying Roman empire years ago? If so, then Jews have rightful ownership of the land. It seems to me that it is Arabs who are occupying Israel, and that is the source of the conflict.

Eric
Belgium
16/07/2008
Whenever a controlling power (such as England) relinguishes power, a power vacuum results followed (often) by civil war. We are witnessing a similar phenomenon in Iraq.

Eric
Canada
16/07/2008
a little more
Had the Ottoman empire survived, it is likely that the resulting civil war of 1948 would not have occured.

Eric
Canada
16/07/2008
more
Palestine/Transjordan would still be a single entity. Civil war visits atrocities on all sides. This particular civil war has been over for 60 years.

Eric
Afghanistan
16/07/2008
more still
The borders are (more or less) formed. It is time for everyone to move on, and stop dreaming about some sort of Shangri-La that probably never truly existed.

Eric
Canada
16/07/2008
at Last
The Arab governmenrs are synically using this issue to focuss the anger of the Arab masses at Israel so they will be distracted from focussing on the shortcomings of their own governments.

J.
United States
17/07/2008
War
It is unfortunate that the people in these towns were forcibly removed but they have only their Palestinian brethren to blame. Palestine had a clear chance at peace when UN181 divide the land giving Israel the land were there was a majority of Jews and Palestine the land where there was a majority of Palestinians... Israel accepted it and Palestine rejected. Rather than live side by side with Israel, Palestine chose to start the '48 War. "Live by the sword and die by the sword."

Mohannad El-Khairy
United Arab Emirates
21/07/2008
Comment
Palestine has endured centuries of foreign rule 23 different empires have come and gone having ruled the Holy Land bringing their own influences and traditions. While most conquered by force, still none of them have systematically attempted to ethnically cleanse, humiliate, disposess and destroy the native Palestinians the way Israel does. The plight of the Palestinians is natural a right, and Isralies should be the first to understand this basic fact following their ancestor's experiences.

Michelle K. Gross
United States
22/07/2008
" whats the basic difference ? "
Mr. Simonin's question merits an answer from everyone who reads this page. Were the residents of the Warsaw ghetto lucky enough to live and die in 'Aza, they would merit a burial and descendants to mourn them.

F Dar
United Kingdom
11/07/2008
The Nakaba
Thank you for this informative article.The dispossession of innocent Palestinians' home-land,in order to solve Europe's "Jewish Problem" by creating a"State" exclusively for Jews ,was a great crime. But it seems it was only a beginning,because "Israel" is now being used by The West to terrorise,fragment,destabilize..& soon to colonize the Arab region??If the Palestinians were politically& militarily "un-prepared" in 1948,the Arab countries TODAY are so too!

T.Foster
Great Britain (UK)
11/07/2008
Dispossession of Palestinians
Exactly the same fate was accorded almost fifteen million German civilians in the after math of the Second World War.Three million died or were brutally murdered during this greatest movement of peoples in history.They were liberated of everything,home,heimat and life itself. Who cares today?No-one!If it happens to Jews it is catastrophic to others-that's fate! Welcome to the western value system.

Chris
Poland
11/07/2008
why always the same school of historians?
One can't expect to see in AJ any other historian in this field than Pappe,Morris,Katz etc.- always only one side is presented. A short look into Wikipedia about 'Plan D' shows that the passage 'aiming control of the areas of Jewish settlement and concentration which are located outside the borders' was cut such that the context has changed - just to prove the preassumed thesis. Find Efraim Karsh's articles in the www to see more of anipulation of sources from this group of historians.

Juergen Hoffmann
Thailand
11/07/2008
Al-Ramla and further
I want to thank Aljazeera for this brilliant article and all the articles before about this sensitive thema. It is very difficult to find the truth of all this unlawful occupations that go until in our times and I'm glad to read and see what is the really truth.

Nabil Salah
United Kingdom
11/07/2008
We need to look into the mirror.
The core decision of the Arab leadrship to "fight until death" against the "Jewish infidels" brought the Palestinian people to this disaster. We have to look ourselves in the mirror and understand that we brought this disaster upon ourselves, not the jews.

Kerry
United States
11/07/2008
Myopic View
Typical! How about mentioning that Arabs started attacking Jews prior to the creation of Israel.

Nancy Jarmin
United States
11/07/2008
The Nakaba
Thank you for printing this. Articles such as this need to appear more frequently and more widely in the US to show the US taxpayers what happened and is happening to the Palestinians courtesy of US tax dollars. It is a crime. Thank you

Christopher Rushlau
United States
11/07/2008
If you used your technology this way
by spreading facts, you wouldn't have to rely on the US sending you F-16's to spread threats with. Facts allow peace. Threats demand war.

Mohannad El-Khairy
United Arab Emirates
11/07/2008
Ramleh
Thank you Al Jazeera & Sandy for an excellent account of the truth behind Israel's war of "independence", an existence that was achieved through a war of annexation. Hundreds of Palestinian towns like Ramleh were ethnically cleansed, & many more were wiped off the map. Sheikh Mustafa El-Khairy is my great grandfather & reading this article was like listening to my father's own account of that dreadful day in 1948. Peace will always be meaningless without true Justice.

Steve Dill
United States
11/07/2008
Time to Move On
I have heard this story about Ramle and Lydda many times. Not long ago I wrote a post to the Israeli publication HAARETZ that George Habash should be buried in his hometown of Lydda. It was not exactly well received. What happened here and in places like Deir Yassan was indeed a tragedy, however that have been 1000s of Nakhbas all over the world. During the 20th century there were 180 million refugees driven from their homes in 255 different conflicts around the world. It is time to move on.

Mike
United States
11/07/2008
Whats the big deal?
The Israelis undertook to clear the enemy from the road between two major cities surely an obvious thing to do. The enemy were the Arabs. That's what happens in war. This clearing of enemy populations happened all over Europe at the end of WWII. However in Europe the populations settled down elsewhere and got on with their (new) lives. There is something pathetic about the inability of Arabs to adapt.

David Cross
United Kingdom
11/07/2008
The Fall of an Arab town in 1948
Dear Sandy Tolan Thank you for your informative article, which helps contest the dominant narrative of Israel's past. The collective memory of the Palestinian people is a vital element of the historical awareness needed to inform political and economic resistance to Israel.

Abdul
United States
11/07/2008
Enough, enough with the propaganda. 7 Billion Israelis attacked 5 poor Palestinian families.... Oh come on, get real, learn the real history, and not what your brain was trained to believe.

Esam
Afghanistan
11/07/2008
The Fall Of An Arab Town in 1948
What happened in 1948 is that the Palestinians faced an European style war carried out with its racist attitude and all. And now some people expect the Palestinians to keep quiet and do as they're told, and to accept refugees like many in Europe did despite the fact that European refugees did not steal anyone's land when they resettled. Israel needs to accept the fact that if anyone wants to share political power with them it's not as a result of some kind of "anti-Semitic" ideology.

Ramon
Canada
12/07/2008
One Tin Soldier Rides Away
Very slowly, it seems the truth will come out, against all odds. For North Americans, it is extremely difficult to reconfigure what they were taught in childhood. The zionists have maintained the worst kind of aggression this world has ever seen. Very very slowly, more and more people worldwide will "get it". In this discussion, I marvel that any American might feel a vanquished culture should adapt to defeat—will the Americans themselves be that ready to lie down and die?

Dave
United States
12/07/2008
One million to zero
Yep, the Jews are always at fault, r ight?. This is the reason why you keep radical Islamists fighting. Things like the Hebron massacre of 1929, in which the Jews were slaughtered, are ignored. To deny that Arabs voluntarily left is a lie. Witness the many Israeli Arabs whose parents decided to stay. They have citizenship. You ignore the expulsion and treatment of Jews in Arab lands and the slaughters. Why don't you tell both sides?

Michael Barber
United Arab Emirates
12/07/2008
The fall of an Arab town
What a fascinating debate indeed. Imagine I am a South African living in the Middle East and I speak to people from both sides of the debate daily to try and form and opinion of the nature of the struggle between Israel and Palestine - objectively. Listen to both sides, and then form an opinion without prejudice. Perhaps we need to start respecting each others differences, accept that it takes two sides to make history, and then to continue planning a peaceful future for our children.

annie
Belgium
12/07/2008
Time to move on ?
Sure, had it happened and stopped in 1948 but to this day the land grabbers continue to steal Palestinian land. Palestinians were never proposed one shekel in dammages and the argument that one expelled Palestinian equals one Jew who left an Arab country most times volontarily is hogwash. A Jew from Morocco is the concern of Morocco not of any Palestinian.

Waqqas Khan
United States
12/07/2008
Home
This land was the home of the Palestinians and they cannot be forcefully removed because of the fault of others. Even if they voluntarily moved away then why another state was being built there without the consent of those who were already living there...I think the "democracy" teaches this.

Mohannad El-Khairy
United Arab Emirates
12/07/2008
Responses
Steve:Then why are Israeli families now suing 5 Lebanese banks for damages caused during the war 2yrs ago?By your reasoning, shouldnt they "move on" too? Justice needs to be served.You can’t ask a nation to let go of what is rightfully legally historically theirs.

Mohannad El-Khairy
United Arab Emirates
12/07/2008
Response 2
Mike:People in Europe were ultimately given the option to return.They werent kept stateless in horrid refugee camps for60+ yrs.Why don’t you visit the camps in the West Bank Gaza Lebanon&Jordan,& then comment on whether ull be able to ‘adapt’. There's something utterly pathetic abt ur double-standard&racist undertone.

Mazen El-Khairy
Canada
12/07/2008
The fall of an Arab Town in 1948
I am the grandson of Sheikh Mustafa and I witnessed the events mentioned in your article. My first comment is about the Arab Legion (the regular army) who also had a unit in El-Ramla and withdrew that same night although the town was under siege!! The second comment is the recent emergence of the truth by historians like Ilan Pappe. I hope your reader Nabil Salah and the rest of the doubters read Professor Pappe's book "The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine"

Mohannad El-Khairy
United Arab Emirates
12/07/2008
Response 3
Dave:Israel is at fault, & so are all Arab regimes that colluded w/ the Jewish state for their own interests during the war. An entire nation was ethnically cleansed. Those that stayed are not being treated as equals (more like second-third class citizens). See [http://english.aljazeera.net/nr/exeres/ed4212d5-5cee-4d8e-b41c-85f5351111cb.htm] Shouldn’t Jews be the first to understand this?

Candace
United States
13/07/2008
article:The fall of an Arab town in 1948
Now why doesn't Aljazeera make an attempt for real balance by running an article about the thousands of Jews expelled from Arab countries after the creation of Israel. Display their pain at loosing all their property, homes, communities. There are plenty to choose from, they number around 600,000 and their families now make up the majority of Israeli's (55%) population. The Arab league voted to 'make room' for the PA's by expelling their Jews. All but Morocco took part PAs not so welcome.

Tilman Porschütz
Korea (South)
13/07/2008
Perception
I believe this article, but I don't judge either side out of this. It's a detail, and truely Jews, Arabs, and Christian are involved in this history. Watching the hatred people with a common ideology can spread and be used for interests that are not at all their own, makes me think. Placing a western state as remote as Isreal within the Arab league, has and will always face aggressions. But truely, the Zionist movement actated not as actual refugees. Adapting is impossible for religion splits em

Wolf
United States
13/07/2008
Not everyone in America thinks the same way...
Sadly, my country has chosen to continue to support a dodgy police state with billions of dollars in foreign aid and military expertise as they seek to cleanse the land of Muslims in the name of a Zionist "Fatherland". Even today, Israel continues to be belligerent and a loose, dirty cannon for US oil policy. The Jewish people deserve better than Israeli crimes, the Palestinians deserve to be welcome in their own home, and the world deserves better than yet another militant police state.

Constantine Blyuz
Israel
13/07/2008
AJ starts to be similar to every other Arab Channel
Of course, Arabs were so generous, they wanted "one-state solution", the attacked only "in retaliation", and the attack on Israel by 7 armies + locals was just for fun. It is nice to forget that Israel lost 1% of its 600,000 population in this war, that Jerusalem was brutally sieged, that Arab armies had tanks, planes etc before the war and both Egyptians&Jordanians were a few km from Tel Aviv. If the arabs won - all the Jewish population of Israel would be massacred, like earlier in Hebron.

Mazen El-Khairy
Canada
13/07/2008
The fall of an Arab Town
To Candace: The expulsion of Jews from Arab countries is another myth. Again, according to Professor Ilan Pappe (an Israeli historian) they were lured by the Jewish Agency except in Iraq where the government of that country under Nouri Al-Said expelled them under pressure from the great powers of the day for obvious reasons! As I said in my previous comment, the truth is coming out in spite of the huge probaganda machines that are utilized in our World to make Israel look like the victim.

Vishnu Mahant
United States
13/07/2008
The fall of Arab town
Good article. History is to learn from it. How are the rich Arabs helping the cause? Educate and unite Arabs to be a strong community, not by fanatic Wahabi teaching, but by empowering their people.

lml
United States
14/07/2008
Better than Seinfeld
This story, and it is truly a story is funnier than a good Seidfeld episode."One state for all", meaning all arab."difficult to control" , haven for terrorists."fighters drifted away to fight another day" Arab cowards."arabs adhered to embargo", arabs never adhered to any agreement. Just too funny.

Mazen El-Khairy
Canada
14/07/2008
General reflections on the Arab Israeli conflect
The Palestinians had to pay the price for the crimes committed by Europe in general and Germany in particular. The victim of these crimes became the ruthless aggressor against innocent people and through financial power and huge world wide propaganda machines was able to hide the ethnic cleansing of Palestine and the crimes against humanity that were committed against her people. Its time people of the World dare to speak up, without fear, about a situation far worse than South Africa.

steve dill
United States
14/07/2008
Jordan is Palestine
Very nice article. 80% of it might even be correct. Doesn’t change the fact that the overwhelming majority of Pal Refugees left of their own free will before the fighting began, or that there would never have been any fighting had the Arab league accepted the partition plan, or that the whole thing could have been easily resolved had the Arabs states negotiated a peace deal with Israel immediately after the 1949 armistice. 80% of Palestine is now Jordan. Prior to 1922 Jordan was only a river.

Juergen Hoffmann
Thailand
14/07/2008
The fall of an Arab town in 1948
Resonse Mazen El-Khairy There is no doubt that the Jews suffered a lot under the Nazi Regime that they wanted a "save heaven" afterwards. But instead to make it in a peaceful way they copied their masters and made it even better. But in our world today, who cares, everybody cares only for his own belly, unfortunately.

Michelle K. Gross
United States
14/07/2008
Only an extraordinary person has a chance of discerning which version of history is more likely to have taken place. Perhaps this aritlce provides the numbers that your article is missing: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/refugees.html Sincere regards 28 miles away from "the most frequently crossed land-border in the world." Residents of San Diego/TJ know first-hand the challenges of living in a bi-national city which has a history of conquest and official apartheid

Mohannad El-Khairy
United Arab Emirates
15/07/2008
Re: Palestine is Jordan
Exactly it could have been resolved but it wasn't. For the exact points named above, namely that the Arab states were working in conjuction with the West that guaranteed Israel's victory. I dont get the double-stantard. How do people claim that Pals fled out of their own free will whn mass movements occur for basic survival & safety reasons! Whn the fighting stops everyone is legally allowed to return.

randy
Australia
15/07/2008
The fall of aN ARAB TOWN
Hey guys, it is simple. You and every surrounding Arab army attacked Israel the day the UN proclaimed. You lost get over it For every dispossessed palestinian there are jews forced out of your Arab brothers land

Michelle K. Gross
United States
15/07/2008
"...everyone is legally allowed to return."
Who will remind US that 200K native Hawaiians want compensation in their own homeland, similar to what all other native peoples in the US and Canada receive? see: native+hawaiian+government+reorganization+Act see http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080620/news_1n20palace.html

George
United States
17/07/2008
Jews not expelled from Arab states
The claim that Arab states expelled their Jews is a blood libel. Those Jews left because they were following the Zionist impulse, perverted as that impulse may be. Israeli historians have documented this. See "Hitching a ride on the magic carpet: Any analogy between Palestinian refugees and Jewish immigrants from Arab lands is folly in historical and political terms" by Yehouda Shenhav, Prof. at Tel Aviv U (Ha'aretz, August 15, 2003). No more David Irving history, please.

Mohannad El-Khairy
United Arab Emirates
17/07/2008
RE: "Get over it"
Hey Randy, either ur not reading any of the above comments or ur in denial! Again: Arab armies didnt invade in the hopes of liberating Palestine. It was all planned to make it seem like an attack but it actually guaranteed Israel's existence. History was distorted, as it usually is in the West. Best of luck attempting to look deeper into what really happened.

pete42y
Afghanistan
18/07/2008
war will go on forever
arabs are unable to come to terms with the creation of Israel. Back in 1947 war started because arabs refused to acept the creation of a jewish state in palestine. 60 years later they have not realized they were the ones who started the 47 /48 war. Arabs were victims of their hate towards Israel. As long as arab atitute towards Israel does not change, peace will not come

J.c. Simonin
Switzerland
18/07/2008
The Fall of an Arab Town in 1948
Come to think of it, what's the basic difference ? Between God's Own People and Herrenrasse (The Master Race)? Between the Promised Land and the 1000jährige Reich? Between Eretz Israel and the "Drang nach Osten" ? (The eastward Push) Between the Warsaw Ghetto and the Gaza Strip ? Between Zionism and National-Socialism ? among other things...

Dan
United States
18/07/2008
History
the cries of "get over it" are crude, but have some weight. History is a funny thing: atrocities, wars, alliances and all things that make all of us human. yes, the pals have a claim to that land from pre 1947, but the jews have a claim before that. do the pals have a claim before that? what about the italians? they held that land for a time.. and the egyptians, hittites, greeks/macedonians, persians, and giants (Og, king of Bashan).

dan
United States
18/07/2008
present
i think the native americans (how they suffered!) have insight. survive, innovate and exploit the weaknesses of your enemys -err customers (welcome to the casino!)

Will D
United States
21/07/2008
1948
So now we see the birth of terrorism and where it began. Between 1945 and 1979 we see what the western foreign policy has done to the middle east. History 101

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article