UPDATED ON:
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
05:39 Mecca time, 02:39 GMT
 
News Americas
McCain aide 'regrets' terror remark
McCain has distanced himself from the comments [GALLO/GETTY]

A senior adviser to John McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, has apologised for saying a major terrorist attack in the US before November's election would benefit McCain.

Charlie Black, a political adviser to McCain, told Fortune magazine that such an attack "certainly would be a big advantage to him".

Black apologised in a statement on Monday after McCain said he disagreed with the remarks.

"I deeply regret the comments, they were inappropriate," he said.

Black was also quoted as saying the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, the former Pakistani prime minister, in December 2007, "helped us".

When questioned about Black's comments during a news conference, McCain said: "I cannot imagine why he would say it; it's not true. I've worked tirelessly since 9/11 to prevent another attack on the United States of America. My record is very clear."

Security issue

A McCain campaign official said Black did not remember making the particular comment to Fortune but did not dispute the characterisation.

In focus

In-depth coverage of
the US presidential election
The official said what Black meant was that a focus on national security issues was good for McCain.

The campaign of Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate, condemned the remark, calling it a "complete disgrace".

"The fact that John McCain's top adviser says that a terrorist attack on American soil would be a 'big advantage' for their political campaign is a complete disgrace, and is exactly the kind of politics that needs to change," said Bill Burton, an Obama spokesman.

John Kerry, the Massachusetts senator who lost to George Bush in the 2004 election, said Black's comment smacked of "the worst of the Rove-Bush fear playbook", a reference to Bush's former political adviser, Karl Rove.

In the 2004 presidential race, Dick Cheney, the vice-president, and other Republicans argued Kerry was weak on national security, an argument that resonated with voters at the polls.

The Republicans also questioned the Democrats' record on national security in 2002, and it paid dividends at the polls in the congressional elections.

 Source: Agencies
 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article