UPDATED ON:
Friday, July 25, 2008
20:12 Mecca time, 17:12 GMT
 
News Americas
Karzai 'protecting drug lords'
Afghanistan produced 93 per cent of the world's opium last year [AFP]

A former senior US anti-drug official has accused Afghanistan's president of playing the US "like a fiddle" and protecting drug lords in his country for political reasons.

Thomas Schweich, who until June served as US state department co-ordinator for counter-narcotics and justice reform for Afghanistan, said Hamid Karzai was impeding the so-called war on drugs.

But the US government underscored its continued support for Karzai on Thursday despite the allegations.

Schweich wrote in an article on the New York Times website on Wednesday that "narco-corruption went to the top of the Afghan government".

Karzai told reporters he did not know about the specific allegations in the New York Times report but he defended Kabul's attempt to target the problem.

"Without a doubt, some Afghans are drugs smugglers, but the majority of them are the international mafia who do not live in Afghanistan," he said.

Drug production has skyrocketed since the US-led invasion that ousted the Taliban in 2001.

Production soaring

In 2007, nearly 200,000 hectares of land in Afghanistan was used to cultivate poppy - more than double the area in 2003 – and the country produced 93 per cent of the world's supply of opium, the raw material of heroin.

Schweich also said that the Taliban fighting Karzai's government profited from drugs, but Karzai was reluctant to move against big drug lords in his political power base in the south, where most of the country's opium and heroin is produced.

"Karzai was playing us like a fiddle," Schweich wrote.

"The US would spend billions of dollars on infrastructure development; the US and its allies would fight the Taliban. Karzai's friends could get richer off the drug trade," he wrote.

"Karzai had Taliban enemies who profited from drugs but he had even more supporters who did."

Schweich also accused the Pentagon and some US generals of obstructing attempts to get military forces to assist and protect opium crop eradication drives.

'Warlord government'

Nato and US military commanders have been reluctant to get involved in the drug fight, arguing that destroying farmers' crops would alienate tribesmen and increase support for the Taliban.

International troops claim Taliban fighters are funded by the drugs trade in Afghanistan [AP]
Hillary Mann Leverett, a former US National Security Council official for Afghanistan, told Al Jazeera that the US knew that government ministers in Afghanistan, including the minister of defence in 2002, were involved in drug trafficking.

"When I worked on this issue at the White House in 2001 and 2002, we were made aware, very clearly aware, that the highest government officials, including the minister of defense at the time, were drug traffickers ... and there was a serious question of what would we do, how would we get aid into Afghanistan, deal with this Afghan government.

The report also points out that instead of fighting drugs and corruption, Karzai appointed Izzatulla Wasifi – a convicted heroin dealer - to his inner circle in government, as anti-corruption committee head.

Afghan ministers at that time had little expertise but were appointed because "they were warlords, they were thugs, they represented various ethnic and sectarian constituencies", Mann Leverett said.

She added that the US government chose to work with them in an attempt to stop Afghanistan becoming a haven for al-Qaeda.

"Instead of funding the warlords we could have funded the UN to have a security peacekeeping force throughout the country.

Brother's denial

Another claim made in the New York Times article is that Ahmad Wali, Karzai's brother, is directly involved in the drugs trade in southern Afghanistan.

Al Jazeera's James Bays, reporting from Kabul, said Wali had denied the claims, saying they were politically motivated.

He said Wali told him he had been "putting up wth these smears for nearly seven years ... and when someone wants to get at the president, they come after me".

Gonzalo Gallegos, a state department spokesman, did not directly address Schweich's allegations but defended US policy and backing for Karzai.

"We know and understand that there is a corruption issue in Afghanistan but we're working with the sovereign government," Gallegos said on Thursday.

"President Karzai has shown us through word and deed that he is working with us to help improve the plight of that country."

Gallegos added that corruption was a deeply rooted problem and solving it would take time.

 Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Feedback Number of comments : 10
 
Akira Yamanaka
Japan
26/07/2008
Where does it go ?
As an international opinion, There is a theory that everyone can think of, aparting from a practice. Where does the financial support by other countries, including from the Jaqpanese people, go to ? It must be pretty much, and be able to become the fund for the alternative crops instead of opiums. Of course, there must be practical problem. But what is most needed way of using the foreign financial support is just that. There would be no nation which is builted on spreading corrupts base.

mike
United States
27/07/2008
protecting drug lords
The US goverment is not worried about the men making a fortune off of the drug trade. Just about the people who use the drugs. Instead of cutting the head off of the snake and getting rid of the problem, we arrest our own people by the hundreds of thousands and lock them in prison for having drugs. Its only illegal if you are poor!

Masood
Afghanistan
28/07/2008
karzai and warlords
here are people with each haveing their own greedy interests while destroying afghanistan. The US bringing more gun and powder and letting the failed karzai to govern to protect their evil interests. Essentialy all this sufferings has been brought by the foreigner (russia, US, europeans). offcourse if there is no jobs,no income for the people tyhen growing opium is the only way.

Chris
United States
30/07/2008
Karzai and Afghanistan compromises
Afganistan is holding onto a central government because of such compromises. Do you think Karzai or the government would live a month if a stand were taken against this element which brings such large amounts of cash into the country? The unity behind the current battle against the Taliban and foreign elements comes at a cost felt in almost every community in developed countries.

terry mckinney
Afghanistan
26/07/2008
Karzai the fall guy
The US has watched as the drug trade has doubled and tripled and on up.Blame Karzai if you like,but he's not the problem.The Taliban had narcotics at an all time historic low when they ran the country.America likes to blame everyone else for it's own corruption.Where do you think all that heroin is being injected?Drugs are gaining popularity with each passing year.America is the only country in the world that is deluded enough to think they can reverse the trend.Drug prohibition is futile.

KhairKhwa
Afghanistan
26/07/2008
Truth is that the Afghan Govt is corrupt, the aid is not going into reconstruction but towards the warlords and other opium smugglers pockets in the Government. The Governmet in turn is composed of warlords like Dostum and other corrupt leaders. The West is making the same mistake as it did in the 80s by supporting one group against the other even though their corruption is widely known now. The West woulednt move against these smugglers and coruupt leaaders

Khairkhwa
Afghanistan
26/07/2008
The West wont move against these leaders beacuse that will propel a war against NATO on a much bigger scale than currently seen by other factions like Hekmatyar's and Taleban. The NATO and US forces dont want to risk creating a fight with the North Allaince, Pro Karzai Pashtuns guys and Dostum/Hazara factions.

Saintcute
Afghanistan
26/07/2008
Karzai protecting drug lords
It may be a truth since his brother's history speaks loud about the possiblity and drug lords are an international force siding / financing the miscreants,so Kazai is not capable of tackling the all time powerful tradesmen.

lme
Ireland
26/07/2008
New Grouping?
"but the majority of them are the international mafia?" This is said like a definite article. As in there is a grouping of individuals called the "international mafia". That is a new term. Its normally cartels from such a place or gangs from somewhere else not an International Mafia. Over analyzing?

liz
United Kingdom
26/07/2008
Karzai and the Drug Mafia
This is a sad state of affairs, begs the question what are we doing there, who are we helping? Are we maintaining the status quo, propping up a weak leadship, keeping the drug barons in power? We should 'Agent Orange' all the fields, this would stop the funding of weapons against us and stop the heroin trade wrecking so many lives in the West.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article