UPDATED ON:
Saturday, August 23, 2008
19:16 Mecca time, 16:16 GMT
 
News Americas
Peru repeals tribal land laws
The repeal is a blow to Garcia, who passed the laws under powers granted to him by congress [AFP]

Thousands of Peruvian Indians have staged celebrations after Peru's congress voted to repeal two controversial laws that would have allowed the selling of Amazonian tribal lands to developers.

Legislators voted 66-29 in favour of repealing the laws, which had been issued by Alan Garcia, the president,  on Friday.

Thousands of Indians celebrated in the main plaza of Bagua, a Peruvian jungle city where protesters had clashed with police on Wednesday.

"This is a new dawn for our people and for all Peruvians who wish to develop in liberty, not in oppression," Alberto Pizango, president of the Peruvian Jungle Inter-Ethnic Development Association, said.

Economists estimate around $3.5bn worth of timber, mineral and oil products are locked in a 92,000-square km region of the Amazon basin.

Protesters feared the laws, which made it easier for mining and energy companies to buy communally owned land, would lead to a land grab, especially in the Amazon rain forest.

Indigenous leaders said they were never consulted about the laws and that they were intended only to benefit a free trade agreement Peru has signed with the United States.

'Historic mistake'

Friday's vote was a major defeat for Garcia, who decreed the laws under powers congress awarded him to bring Peruvian law in line with the free-trade pact.

Around 12,000 Peruvians from 65 indigenous tribes had occupied oil and electricity plants in the Amazon basin from August 9, before agreeing to suspend their protests late on Wednesday after the head of Peru's legislature agreed to hold a vote on the laws.

Garcia's administration insists the development laws were aimed at improving the livelihood of indigenous communities by developing their farming, livestock and mining activities, and integrating the tribes into the country's economy.

He said on Wednesday that it would be "a very serious, historic mistake" to revoke the laws.

"If that were to happen out of fear of protesters, fear of unrest, Peru would someday remember it as the moment when change came to a halt and hundreds of thousands of people were condemned to poverty, exclusion and marginalisation," he said.

The president now has 15 days to sign the laws' repeal or amend them and send them back to congress, which can then override his vote.

Feedback Number of comments : 8
 
Elan David
United States
24/08/2008
Peru repeals tribal lands
Mr. Garcia is a charlatan of the first order with little shame and a little mind. He is a total and complete disgrace to many Peruvians who speak about him here in the USA.

vern Johnson
Canada
26/08/2008
more US skulduggery
Alan Garcia was behaving in a very high-handed manner but congress mistakenly gave him the authority. US influence must be behind the scene.

Sebastian Mosqueira
Pakistan
26/08/2008
I think that all things have been misunderstood. What Garcia is trying to reach with the laws is to open the market specially at the Sierra (Mountains). There, the working mass has very low or nothing education, and the production is very poor. If the control methods are correctly stated in the laws, then the project could be really productive. The market of Peru is still to centralized. It is time that we, peruvians, start to use and take advantage of all the resources we have.

maybiam
United Kingdom
27/08/2008
Just Curious
All these comments are from people in other countries except Peru. I just wonder how Peruvians feel about this. I myself from UK reading about the Amazon forest, do agree that opening the forest for outsiders to plunder is wrong, in any way you look at it.

Ivo Costa
Peru
28/08/2008
No to Amazon Selling
I'm not peruvian but my girlfriend is... thank god that law wasn't approved. Some peruvian may think that this was a wrong decision but if they saw what was done at Cajamarca by the gold mines at Yanacocha, they would change their minds. The mines didn't change life, "campesinos" still are poor and uneducated, but now the pollution is giving cancer to poor people that can't defend themselves. It's was the best decision rejecting this law

Earl west
United States
29/08/2008
Auality of Life
Repeal of the laws will prove to be the best course for the Peruvian people impacted. Such laws that allow for the "rape" of eco systems rarely benefit the local populations, only the big business concerns.

Lamorial
Canada
29/08/2008
Peru repeals tribal land laws
Free trade agreements - a misnomer - are nothing but free passes for Multinationals to rape and plunder resources or anything, they couldn’t care less about people or zilch, only the money.

bc ren
United States
29/08/2008
amazon rain forest
Global community, one does not have to speculate about what opening up the Amzon rain forest MIGHT do. Let's see, there's the Brazilian example: A large portion of deforestation in Brazil can be attributed to land clearing for pastureland by commercial and speculative interests, misguided government policies, inappropriate World Bank projects, and commercial exploitation of forest resources. Hmmm.... smells like Neo-colonialism, Neo-imperialism. Only thing that has changed is time.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article