UPDATED ON:
Thursday, September 11, 2008
06:55 Mecca time, 03:55 GMT
News Americas
US sees 'endgame' in Iraq
Gates, left, and Mullen said Afghanistan needed extra support for its security [AFP]

The US defence secretary has said that the country has reached the "endgame" in Iraq, but warned that troop reductions there should be undertaken with caution.

The decision by George Bush, the US president, to bring only 8,000 troops home from Iraq "represents not only the right direction but the right course of action", Robert Gates said on Wednesday.

"I believe we have now entered that endgame and our decisions today and in the months ahead will be critical to regional stability and our national security interests for the years to come," he told politicians gathered in Washington.

The address by Gates and Admiral Michael Mullen, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, comes a day after Bush announced an increase in forces to Afghanistan.

Afghanistan focus

While the Bush administration has said that Iraqi security has improved in recent months, US and Nato forces in Afghanistan are facing increasingly frequent attacks from fighters linked to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.

"I am not convinced we are winning yet in Afghanistan but I am convinced we can," Mullen said.

"That is why I intend to commission and am looking at a more comprehensive military strategy for the region that covers both sides of that border."

But Mullen said that Afghanistan needs more than just "boots on the ground".

"It needs more trucks on the roads, teachers in schools, trained judges and lawyers in courts, foreign investments, alternative crops, sound governance, the rule of law - these are the keys to success in Afghanistan," he said.

"We cannot kill our way to victory."

Caution advised

The US military is working with Pakistan's government in an attempt to crack down on Taliban and al-Qaeda linked fighters who are believed to be based in Pakistan's border region with Afghanistan, Gates said.

The US  says Iraqi security has improved
but remains fragile [AFP]
"I do believe that Islamabad appreciates the magnitude of the threat from the tribal areas, particularly the uptake in suicide bombings directed against Pakistani targets," he said.

"During this time of political turmoil in Pakistan it is especially critical that we maintain a strong and positive relationship with the government, since any deterioration would be a setback for Afghanistan and Pakistan," he said.

"The war on terror started in this region and must end there."

However, Gates said that Iraqi security was still fragile and warned that the situation could deteriorate unless there is continued diligence on the security front.

Improvements to security in Iraq could have "the potential of overriding a measure of caution borne of uncertainty," he said.

"The planned [US troop] reductions are an acceptable risk today that also provide for unforeseen circumstances in the future," he said.

"The reductions also preserve a broad range of options for the next commander-in-chief who will make his own assessment after taking office in January," he said.

"As we proceed deeper into the endgame, I would urge our leaders to implement strategies that while steadily reducing our presence in Iraq also take into account the advice of our commanders," he said.

 Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
 
Topics in this article
People

Country

Feedback Number of comments : 8
 
Matthew Houston
United States
10/09/2008
End Game
Why not create a network of potential government creation councils which could debate into existence a form of government which all involved parties would be subject to. This could include both Pakistan and Afghanistan...could be theoretical to begin with, but also could result in altered government procedures for both countries, and even for the US itself (by completely legal means of course)...this would give both sides the opportunity to transform their enemy without violence.

gene falco
Afghanistan
10/09/2008
Why the conflicts in oil rich areas?
Diamonds, gold, silver, oil.... control production and you can name your price. Lose control of production and competition drives the price down. There you have it. People are routinely sacrificed for profit.

Gus St. Anthony
Afghanistan
11/09/2008
The US has never left a once occupied country
There are still American military bases in Japan and Germany. Believing that the American military presence in Iraq or Afghanistan will, somehow, go away is a pipe dream. And, Afghanistan can certainly supply the stuff for the pipe.

secretslave
United States
10/09/2008
Take Wisdom away & security problems do grow
salaam, Say USA how is that path to OWNERSHIP matters? Witnesses are not of NEED simply bring warriors and force an agreement democracy ruling for it came without any King, in its rulership matter, and made Wisdom a tossable MATTER. Takes to some Wisdom then when not in agreement to its rules of matter, tosses it aside and claims NO RECORDS BE OF NEED upon portions given to robbery, claiming the weapon makes right. That if it be a RIGHT a fight required, Bush's motto

Amir
United States
10/09/2008
F-16
Instead of buying this useless aircraft, maybe the politicians should relearn the lessens of Saddam: it is better to invest in your own people than to have foreign military equipement. Afterall those who stood up to defend Saddam where his loyals not the foreigners who he financed. The relationship between Sunnis , Shia, Turkmen, Kurd, Bedouin, Yezidi, Assuri and other minorities in Iraq is going to be determined through mutual cooperation not by flying coffins made in USA.

Jim Hunter
Afghanistan
11/09/2008
Endgame in Iraq.
The 'game' will end only when the last Yank goes home which is hardly likely considering the vast investment in 'non-permanent' bases (an 'embassy' with eighteen-feet-thick walls? Gimme a break) and dead or damaged grunts. When the present Yanks are rotated home look forward to a new generation of rooftop/campus snipers. Nostalgia?

Carl Metzgar
United States
15/09/2008
Endgame in Iraq
No one knows what would have happened had the U.S. not intervened in Iraq. One thing for sure is that al-Qaeda showed up once the U.S. did. Many Iraq citizens want peace and hate al-Qaeda. In fact, al-Queda is nothing more than drug dealing, human prostitution, money greedy murduring heathens. Oh yeah , I forgot, they have religious beliefs too. Let the real Iraq citizens reclaim their land. Then the U.S. can get out.

chriss hammerl
Ukraine
16/09/2008
iraq
for me after all..... präsident bush is one of the biggest terrorist in the world! why nobody go after him? how many more human's have to die? how somebody believe in a god! and be responsable for so much murder.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article
Aljazeera.net/english 2003 - 2010 ©
Designed & Developed by Aljazeera IT