UPDATED ON:
Friday, September 26, 2008
22:26 Mecca time, 19:26 GMT
News Americas
'What the US should do for Darfur'

Thousands have died or been forced to flee fighting in Sudan's Darfur region [GALLO/GETTY] 

Daoud Hari, a Darfurian tribesman now living as a refugee in the US, tells Al Jazeera about life in Sudan's troubled Darfur region and what the next president should do to end the conflict there.

"I am a refugee from northern Darfur and I have been in the US since March 2007.

When I was in Darfur I was a translator for journalists. Life in Darfur before the crisis began was very good.

Our lives were very different in Darfur. We don't need in Darfur what the people in the US and Europe have. We don't need electricity or cars, we just need water and our animals.

But then I saw government troops go into villages, kill the people and burn their homes down.

Deadly attacks

My own village was attacked and I lost my brother but it's very hard for me, emotionally, to talk about this.

When government troops attack a village the first thing that you hear is the sound of the helicopters.

You cannot hear the ground troops.

The helicopters start shooting missiles at people first and attack the vehicles of rebels before ground troops come in.

Then afterwards they shoot at everything that moves and when they think it is clear the government troops move in with armoured vehicles and heavy machine guns and they capture the women.

The government says the troops have permission to capture the women as kind of spoils of war.

There are sometimes rebels there who try and defend the people but they only have small weapons like Kalashnikovs and M16s - they cannot do much against the helicopters.

People run for their lives but that cannot do much to get away from helicopters when the villages are attacked. People also try to hide in mountainous areas.

Stopping the genocide

In focus

In-depth coverage of the US election
In 2006 I was captured by the authorities in Sudan while working with an American journalist and I was held in prison for one month.

Bill Richardson, the governor of [the US state of] New Mexico, helped get us released as the journalist was from New Mexico.

I think Richardson had some personal contacts with Omar al-Bashir, the Sudanese president, and he helped get us released.

I think that [US President George] Bush has done a really good job with Darfur.

Before Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, and Gordon Brown, the new prime minister in the UK came in, he was acting alone.

No world leaders talked about the genocide or the crisis in Darfur.

Now Bush is leaving office and we want the next president to do more to help Darfur.

Both [Barack] Obama and [John] McCain have to take action and end any negotiations with the government of Sudan.

The next president of the United States has to make this the most important issue for them, as this the most serious humanitarian crisis on the planet.

They could use sanctions, but they also have to take action to pressure China not to support dicatatorships in Africa and to help stop the genocide there."

Daoud Hari now works for the Save Darfur campaign in the US.

 Source: Al Jazeera
 
Topics in this article
Country

Feedback Number of comments : 10
 
Nelson Lickwar
United States
27/09/2008
What US should do for Darfur
What should we do, nothing ! Its your problem. We have screwed to much up already. Leave us alone, let your continental partners help you. Yes, we have stuck our heads where it does not belong to many times. Fine, then leave our names out of it.find your own way. I don't mean to be cruel but isn't that what the world wants us to do anyway. You have to take the good with the bad.

AAron
United States
27/09/2008
What should the US do...
Why does Al Jazeera (and other media organizations) keep asking the question "What should the U.S. do..." in what ever international issue is of current concern? It has become painfully (and finally) obvious that the U.S. is no longer 'THE' power broker in the world. The United States is now consumed with trying to take care of major economic problems at home. The reality is that the U.S. can not, for logistical and financial reasons, do anything for anybody anymore. Pay attention to Russia.

Alexandre
Canada
28/09/2008
What the US should do for Dafrur?
For now, americans have too much troubles. Then they should take it easy with Darfur.

Scott
United States
28/09/2008
Darfur or Pakistan, or the rest of the world!
Everyone hates us. Look at all the comments out here and everyone thinks that the US is trying to dominate the world, yet everyone wants us to fall and its the end for the US. Yet here are more articles proclaiming what the US needs to do for other countries. Why is my question? Why do you ask us to help when you don't want to help us. Pakistan knew it had financial problems and it's just coming forward because the US fell first. I say help yourself and leave the US alone.

N Pai
Afghanistan
28/09/2008
What should US do for Darfur
I totally agree with the first two posts - US should stay out of any more regional conflicts in future. What with the Iraq misadventure that has cost (and continues to) America dearly and the recent financial troubles it would be better if they looked after their own people first. Perhaps Al-Jazeera should ask what the African nations and the Arab world can do for Darfur.

santino
Sudan
28/09/2008
help the problem of darfur people
I hope that the next president of us should help the problem of darfur Region and all the problem in the sudan. and take the el Bashir to Justice of the world

Zahra Ahmed
United States
29/09/2008
I disagree with the idea that the U.S. should do nothing. The U.S. government has no problem intervening in the affairs of other sovereign nations when it suits their capitalist, imperialist interests. There are millions of people here in the U.S. who are urging our government to do more - to take a leadership position in working with other nations to stop the genocide, and to put pressure on nations like China, which are benefitting from it.

Dan Sebastian
United States
29/09/2008
Pass me some of that African oil...
Hopefully, if we can get into Sudan under the guise of humanitarianism, we can get our hands on the huge recently tapped oil reserves. It's the tried and tested method, worked in Iraq. "its not our fault that God put Americas oil underneath other peoples countries" - Donald Rumsfeld

Samir
United Kingdom
15/10/2008
US in Darfur
Ideally speaking it shouldnt be seen as what the US can do for Darfur. Its more like what the UN and other western and european countries can do. The UN has not learnt anything after the Rwandan genocide. This conflict could have been prevented if they acted early. But alas, I guess if there's no oil in it, then there's not much interest in it is there?

Anjelica
United States
25/11/2008
What US should do for Darfur
You know why the rest of the world hates us? Because we refuse to help other countries that really need it. Why is it that we "help" and "liberate" countries that never ask for it, but when a GENOCIDE is happening we simply ignore it? Yes the US has FINANCIAL issues but is anyone dying because of it? No. So forget our financial issues and help people that are starving, being raped, and killed in their own homes. I'm disgusted with everyone that has posted here from America. You should be ashamed

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article
Aljazeera.net/english 2003 - 2010 ©
Designed & Developed by Aljazeera IT