UPDATED ON:
Monday, September 29, 2008
12:19 Mecca time, 09:19 GMT
 
News Americas
US legislators agree on rescue plan

Legislators emerged to unveil the plan after marathon talks over the weekend [AFP]

US congressional leaders have reached a tentative agreement on a proposed $700bn taxpayer bail-out for the country's troubled financial sector.

The deal includes numerous safeguards added to the original proposal by the Bush administration, including protection for taxpayer dollars and curbs on executive salaries.

Republicans in the House of Representatives who had been the bill's biggest opponents, expressed their support late on Sunday.

US stock index futures rose on Sunday on news of the deal, with Dow Jones industrial average futures up 43 points, Nasdaq 100 gaining 7.75 points and S&P 500 futures rising 0.6 point.

Asian markets initially followed suit on Monday, with indices in Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Singapore and Australia registering gains in early trading but all falling later in the day by as much as two per cent.

European shares also fell heavily on Monday and money markets remained frozen with banks refusing to lend to each other for all but the shortest periods.

Al Jazeera's Anand Naidoo, reporting from Capitol Hill where legislators held marathon talks throughout the weekend, said the house would probably vote on the bill on Monday and it was likely to pass, based on the optimistic language used by congressional leaders.

Criticism

George Bush, the US president, also expressed confidence that the bill would be approved quickly.

IN DEPTH


The US bail-out package

"This plan sends a strong signal to markets around the world that the United States is serious about restoring confidence and stability to our financial system," he said.

Henry Paulson, the US treasury secretary, who under the plan will have unprecedented powers to use taxpayers' money to buy up bad debts, said "I think we're there".

"We've been working very hard on this ... And we've made great progress toward a deal, which will work and will be effective in the marketplace, and, you know, effective for all Americans," he said.

But the enthusiasm was not shared by Michael Zweig, an economics professor from New York, who said the plan offered very little to the ordinary person and warned that the worst was not yet over.

"The bail-out package is a sort of classic example of how the needs and interests of the corporate elites have pushed aside the interests of the ordinary working people.

"I'm quite disturbed that the bail-out package does not include any prospective relief for homeowners facing foreclosure, which is a very significant failure in these negotiations."

Restrictions

If it goes through, the biggest intervention by the government in markets since the Great Depression of the late 1920s will have clauses to protect American taxpayers who will be footing the bill for the rescue.

"The bail-out package is a sort of classic example of how the needs and interests of the corporate elites have pushed aside the interests of the ordinary working people"

Michael Zweig, 
economics professor

The bill looks into the deregulation that many say caused the chaos, as well as place limitations on the pay of participating senior Wall Street executives.

"The party is over. The era of golden parachutes for high-flying Wall Street operators is over. No longer will the US taxpayer bail out the recklessness of Wall Street," Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic house speaker, said in unveiling the plan.

Barney Frank, the chairman of the senate banking committee, said it would be "the first time in the history of the United States that anything has been done by congress to curtail excessive CEO compensation".

"The absence of regulation is at the root of this crisis. It would be irresponsible of us to take this action and not be committed, as we all are, to preventing it from reoccurring.

"There is a recognition in this bill that if there is a shortfall in the amount of money collected as we sell the assets, it should be made up, not by the general taxpayers, but by the financial institutions and the industries that have benefited.

"At the end of five years, the president must send a proposal for us to collect that shortfall from the institutions and industries that benefited."

Al Jazeera's Rosiland Jordan explained that because the government would be buying the financial institutions' bad debts cheaply, it is assumed that the treasury – and therefore the taxpayer - will recoup its investment or even make a profit when the economy rebounds.

Republican support

The bill will also include a provision for companies to take out insurance against failing assets in addition to their being able to sell the assets to the government.

House Republican leaders claimed credit for improving the plan and urged party members to support it.

"We have reduced the amount of taxpayer risk in this bill significantly," John Boehner, the house Republican minority leader, said on Sunday.

"We are supporting this bill." 

Negotiations had nearly unravelled last week when a group of conservative house Republicans – who traditionally hold that the government should not interfere in financial markets - said they preferred the government to offer mortgage insurance to failing financial institutions instead of buying their bad debts.

Acknowledging that "nobody wants to have to support this bill", Boehner said: "I'm encouraging every member whose conscience will allow them to support this.

"We want them [house Republicans] to support this because it is the right thing to do for this country."

Roy Blunt, the house Republican whip, declined to give specific vote estimates but said he expected "substantial support" among house Republicans for the plan.

House speaker Pelosi said she hoped to get a vote on the bill on Monday and Harry Reid, the Democratic senate majority leader, said the senate would try to vote on it by Wednesday before sending it on to Bush to approve.

 Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Feedback Number of comments : 4
 
Michelle
Australia
29/09/2008
hell yea
they should have done it heaps earlier than today. Even if the taxpayers lose billions of dollars it's for their own good as well as the global citizens. Even if it seems like a bad idea atm, it is the best thin we can do about this crisis to prevent the US and the global economy put at risk. America Go go go! =)

John Jones
Canada
29/09/2008
$700 billion into a Hole in the Ground
Nothing has changed. You'll be surprised how fast this money vanishes. By Christmas, or maybe by Spring? And then what? Well, I suppose the taxpayers can do it again. Look, when someone comes to you for money, but he has no plan to not only make such radical changes that it won't happen again BUT ALSO to have some miracle in place to earn so much he can pay you back well, you can be very surprised. A plan bashed together in a week? Forget it. And definitely forget your money.

Indy
India
29/09/2008
Recent events
If the recent events will bring the demise of the US quicker, then let it be so. World will be a better place without the US hegemony. Indy

Joey
United States
30/09/2008
Bailout Plan
Tax the people to bail out the institutions that are raping them through 18%+ interest charge... that doesn't make sense. Charge the people who have profited first, leave the rest to the people.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article