| |
Jordan
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canada opposition bids to unseat PM |
|
|
|
|
|
I fail to see how the opposition parties forming a coalition government is "subverting democracy". Stephen Harper only got 38% of the popular vote, yet the Conservative party and its supporters cry foul and say that the Liberals and New Democrats are trying to cheat the Canadian people.
The majority of Canada is fed up with Harper and his far right agenda. Anyone who tells you otherwise has their head in the sand. |
|
william Magney
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
coalition govt |
|
|
|
|
|
Woonderful! |
|
MB
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harper was elected with less than 40% of the popular vote with less than 60% voter turnout. He does not have the popular support of Canadians, he has a minority government. His time has come to go. |
|
st
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's the right move. The right wing conservatives are wrecking the country and its institutions
|
|
snowey
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
the three dirtbags that have no respect for Canadians |
|
|
|
|
|
Real Canadians know that the conservatives are doing the best for the country. |
|
Milan Becvar
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
The end of Canadas George Bush |
|
|
|
|
|
Hopefully this will be the end of Stephen Harper and his government. Harper is Canada's 'George Bush'. Time to go!! |
|
True Blue Canadian
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadas bloodless coup |
|
|
|
|
|
What is happening in my country is nothing less than a bloodless coup.
The Canadian people were not asked to vote for a coalition of socialists and seperatists. They were asked to vote between 5 political parties, and the conservative party won a larger percentage of the popular vote than any other party. By more than 11%.
This will not be allowed to stand. For the first time in our history, an armed uprising is a possibility. |
|
Shaun Hodgins
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
unsettling |
|
|
|
|
|
This does not feel right. It would if a coalition government was formed before the election, but not afterwards. If a coalition government forms afterwards it should not have presendence until those elected are known as a coalition gov't and elected as such. Also the prime minister should not have the right to change policy in what would controversely seem to benefit one party more than another. I'm starting to see this prime minister make decisions like George W Bush. |
|
Mohamed
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enough Harper |
|
|
|
|
|
Sending our troops to a country like afghanistan will only bring terrorism to Canada and drain our money for hopeless meaningless American foriegn policies.
Harpers and his fat cats have the highest budget in Canadian history.
10 million Canadians didnt vote this year and thats why these guys can rule our country. I blame us Canadians more then anyone else. 10 million dont vote then we complain about how things are heading.
|
|
Roger Kellner
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
unsettling change but who brought it on? |
|
|
|
|
|
Harper's econ. update made no concessions to the other parties supporting his minority govt. Further, having a set and inflexible pre-crisis econ dogma in place, he fails to take account of the econ. rethinking going on everywhere. We are in a deflationary period and the govt wishes to tighten its belt, even if that means an extra 250k unemployed in 09. Its plain stupid and insensitive, and that's why few govts outside Canada, left, right or centre, are contemplating such. |
|
Nathan
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Harper is a compulsive liar |
|
|
|
|
|
Harper is a compulsive liar and needs to go. He lied in the election about keeping Canada out of deficit (if he couldn't tell we were heading for recession he is grossly incompetent), he lied about not taxing income trusts, and now he lied about something so simple about flags in a photo. The fact that Harper can say that it is undemocratic and illegal to form this coalition government, after breaking his own fixed elections law is ridiculous! And his plan now? Prorouge parliment in a recession! |
|
Yossarian
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
coalition government |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian politics is mundane- the coalition government will (most likely) represent Canadians to the same degree that Harper's MINORITY government would...
...but it's still exciting...I'm looking forward to -(or dreaming of)- the day Canadians elect a cocaine growing indigenous/aboriginal prime minister- just like Bolivia |
|
Diz Michaels
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Harper |
|
|
|
|
|
Milan Becvar: Sorry, but Harper is no 'Georger Bush". Learn to read policies, Harper is more left wing, in general, then Obama.
This isnt about the economy, it is about a power grab by the Opposition, by a leader that got defeated in an election. |
|
Jon
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Least of Two Evils |
|
|
|
|
|
As a Canadian student from a middle-class family, I can assure you that Stephen Harper's government was a neo-liberal puppet to the American imperialist agenda. Harper's policies and action strategies have Ayn Rand written all over them. The coalition is an effort to stop that, rather than to gain power. Those parties agree on almost nothing except that Stephen Harper has to go. Their banding together is a desperate act, and the coalition will fracture when Harper has gone. |
|
jeff
Canada |
02/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
coalition government |
|
|
|
|
|
The three stooges have finally shown their colors. What a laugh. In any other country, if you sided with a party that wants to split the country up, you would be tried for treason. It is all over losing their taxpayers party handout. If they had so much support, why are these three partys broke. Contributions come from supporters. I say jail the three traitors. |
|
Seb
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
coalition |
|
|
|
|
|
The reason why Harper is rich is that he changed the financing law that Chretien had forbidden to let big companies finance his campaign, so of course he's got all the oil companies and weapon producing money! what do you think!
The coalition government is the best thing that could happen to Canada right now. Three different visions, working in team to save the country. Three parties will put their differences away to work together. This is progress. |
|
chris hilyer
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
on separatism |
|
|
|
|
|
It is important to consider that Harper's reckless corporate marriage and utter negligence to the average person may have turned more Quebec voters unto the Bloc, while a new coalition could reinstate that lost sense pride through unity against this freekshow.
To the man who tried to introduce private corporate funding to federal election campaigns and who would never defend our beliefs by putting the rights of Canadians above US relations.. goodbye Mr Harper. |
|
Richard
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Coalition |
|
|
|
|
|
There is a great deal of misunderstanding here over this whole issue, most of it stemmed from people not knowing how our electoral/parliament works.
Perhaps before we go around installing these things (parliamentary democracies), we should likely figure out how our own works... |
|
Liam
Canada |
03/12/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Traitors |
|
|
|
|
|
Seb
Something I don't understand. "Three leaders working to save the country" But unless I missed something, one of the leaders stated goal is to split up the country. Please tell me when did the tiger changed his stripes ? |
|