| |
Sipan
Armenia |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Blame Game.. |
|
|
|
|
|
why is everyone blaming China so much. It wasnt China who turned the world upside down these past 9 years. It is America that should be slapped on the wrist. China has been improving and helping many people.
I was very proud of Al-Jazeera before, but now I am seeing that its news is now biased against China. Why so? I am very unimpressed. Thank you. |
|
Tilman Porschütz
Korea (South) |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Facing truth is like drinking milk |
|
|
|
|
|
News report what is going one. But, what is missing, is any kind of response.
To me the olympic idea is one of the most effective cover-ups in history. A perfect event, where the leaders of this world, decide who can join their glory, do some blaming before. Because after all, olympic games are supposed to halt war for the time being, and than celebrate the achievements in the aftermath. Or rather harvest the fruits of all that propaganda effort. Olympics and World Cup are good. |
|
onix
Netherlands |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
aboriginals |
|
|
|
|
|
In australia the situation worsened before olympics (?). This campaign for human and tibet rights is predictable, from the moment Peking was choosen. Unfortunately the argument is loosing credibility. Amnesty and other western organisations use a very one-sided aproach. The scale of events and deads in places like irak, the balkan, afghanistan, somalia etc. would otherways see them speak out against western repression , through militairy violence on a relevant scale. (a *lot*) |
|
eamon
Spain |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Olympics and big money |
|
|
|
|
|
The only reason(virtually) why China has been awarded these games is MONEY. The Games mean zillions of dollars for , you name them. Examples: all the sports firms(Addidas,Nike,etc) The multinational drinks firms(Coca Cola,Pepsi Cola etc)You can add to the list. In China itself zillions have been made by the people involved with the construction of all that has anything to do with the Games. "The Games bring understanding among the different nations" Yeah!. But nothing to the man in the street! |
|
Mike
Canada |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Its too bad... |
|
|
|
|
|
Human rights violations, extreme pollution, media/press oppression, can't bring your kids to events, can't wear simular colors (ie. Team Canada stuff) and the worries of some radical group seeking attention by doing something horrible...
You couldn't pay me enough to attend the beijing Olympics in China.
No how, no way. Which is horrible as I'd love to see the Olympics, just wrong place, wrong time. eh. |
|
Shar
United States |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Human Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes China is a major violator of basic human rights, but not unlike most Arab countries in the way they treat women or most of European countries in the way they treat immigrants. Clean your own houses, we all have our problems. I do not agree with a boycott of the games, only of the commercialism. Do not buy the products retail. |
|
Dan
United Kingdom |
30/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Olympics and freedoms |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Fouad,
you asked "Will they ask the UK to lift the immunity of the police, social services and other oppressive branches of the government?"
There is no immunity for ANYONE in the UK. If they commit an unlawful act they will be put before a court of law and the case tried before a Judge and Jury of peers. I agree that Amnesty International SHOULD make those calls though, even if only to bring the debate into the public eye. |
|
Fouad
Netherlands |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Olympics |
|
|
|
|
|
Will Amnesty International ask the UK to withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan if they're still in those countries at the next olympics? Will Amnesty ask for the UK to prosecute Blair and Hoon for their crimes? Will they ask the UK to lift the immunity of the police, social services and other oppressive branches of the government? Will they ask the UK to accept basic human rights? I hope they do these things because the UK also needs freedom and human rights. |
|
Lily
China |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree Sipan. Indeed, China is a country who loves peace the most in the world. The Chinese government has made great efforts for the human right and the development in economy of the world. And now, it is still doing its best to host the Beijing Olympic Games. |
|
Tim Rennie
Canada |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Why would one ever defend human rights violators? Even in relative terms. |
|
|
|
|
|
While the UK may be involved in an unpopular war,it still allows its citizens to protest without fear of violence or imprisonment.The issue is not foreign policy, but human rights.Surely a government which doesn't respect the rights of its OWN people is not worthy of hosting.Fouad(Netherlands), your analogy is false,the point is that China has hijacked the event as a means of intensifying violations.You shouldn't let your disdain for the UK's democratic government cloud your disdain for tyranny. |
|
Tim Rennie
Canada |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore |
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to add, it seems to me you have no first hand experience of life in the UK, but I can assure you social services like the NHS are far from oppressive branches of government. Can you elaborate on what you might mean? How you can say that a nation which virtually invented basic human rights (magna carta), a nation whose politcal satire (a true mark the free) is second to none, is lacking them on a par with one of the most notorious violators in modern history, escapes me entirely. |
|
andar1000
Colombia |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Human Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
Funny that you would report on the human rights reports on China that come out at the same time that the Palestinians were blasted by the same group for torture and you fail to mention anything on your website. Stop being so bieased. |
|
Kevin
United States |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Boycott |
|
|
|
|
|
What on Earth is wrong with all of you? China's silencing of dissent is in itself a terrible violation of human rights. What about their support of the regime in Khartoum? Agreed that other countries, including my own have had serious human rights abuses as well, and they are in fact condemned by Amnesty. In the end, my country (the US) ought to refuse participation in these games along with all other nations in order not to support further abuse of rights and liberties. |
|
LN
Iran |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
china human rights |
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Kevin (US).
china even defends Sudan in the UN. it is ridiculous to say that china is a supporter of human rights. they are one of the biggest human rights violaters of all time, along with the US, the UK, France, Israel and all other super powers. In fact, practically every government violates human rights (like my own!), either in their own country or in others. Just because amnesty may not criticize the US in Iraq, or Israel in Palestine, it doesn't mean we should ignore china. |
|
Rafael Peres
Brazil |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
"China has been improving and helping many people." |
|
|
|
|
|
Really?
So please tell me why the Chinese Government is supporting the Genocide in Darfur and occupating Tibet?
|
|
johncane
Sierra Leone |
29/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
ridiculous |
|
|
|
|
|
it's very riduculous for kevin in United States to call for US and other countries to boycott the games. do you know the meaning of olympics, do you konw the spirit of olympics. and do you have right to blame others when you cannot do it well yourself. and i agree with Sipan and feel disappointed with aljazeera for its bias against China. |
|
Katerina Andreou
United States |
30/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chinas Human Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
The world keeps appeasing China, which does not improve its human rights, but serves as an incentive for more repressive measures.
The U.S. continuously grants MFN trade status, (which with our outstanding debt owned by them, we must), as they send us defective and unsafe products, pirate copyrighted materials and thumb their noses at us.
THe IOCC should have known better, and put some restrictions or conditions on giving them the games.
Stop coddling them! |
|
Katerina Andreou
United States |
31/07/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chinas Human Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
The IOCC should have demanded proof of better human rights, and been scrutinizing the freedoms that the Chinese promised in turn for hosting the games.
You don't give a tyrant what he wants first, based on his promise, but demand some evidence or proof before granting the reward.
After Tiennamen Square, and numerous other rights' violations, the IOCC had a duty to be more cautious.
The repression and persecution will worsen as China wants to portray the "image" it wants the world to see. |
|