UPDATED ON:
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
18:25 Mecca time, 15:25 GMT
News CENTRAL/S. ASIA
Afghans demand new 'rules of force'
The cabinet also wants an end to illegal detentions and house searches [AFP]

Afghanistan's cabinet has demanded a change in the rules governing international troops in the country, after more than 90 civilians were killed in US-led air attacks last week.

The cabinet said on Monday that a review should focus on the "authorities and responsibilities" of troops and demand an end to air attacks in civilian areas, illegal detentions and unilateral house searches.

The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) human rights team said on Tuesday it found "convincing evidence" that 90 civilians, including 60 children, were killed in the US-led air attacks in the western province of Herat on Friday.

Kai Eide, the UN's special representative in Afghanistan, said: "Investigations by UNAMA found convincing evidence, based on the testimony of eyewitnesses and others, that some 90 civilians were killed, including 60 children, 15 women and 15 men."

Based on UN investigations, it is the highest civilian death toll from international military action since US-led forces invaded in 2001 to remove the Taliban government.

"The destruction from aerial bombardment was clearly evident with some seven-eight houses having been totally destroyed and serious damage to many others," Eide said.

"Local residents were able to confirm the number of casualties, including names, age and gender of the victims."

The US-led coalition said Friday's air raids were on Taliban fighters and 30 of them had been killed, although it is investigating claims of civilian casualties.

Cabinet resolution

A resolution adopted by Afghan ministers during Monday's cabinet meeting said they had asked the foreign and defence ministries to negotiate with officials of international forces.

"The presence of the international community in Afghanistan must be reviewed through a mutual agreement," it said.

"The authorities and responsibilities of the international forces in Afghanistan must be regulated through a 'status of force agreement' consistent with both international and Afghan laws.

"Air strikes on civilian targets, unco-ordinated house searches and illegal detention of Afghan civilians must be stopped."

Nato said it had not been informed of any Afghan plan to renegotiate agreements.

Carmen Romero, a Nato spokeswoman, said that Nato's International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) was "in Afghanistan on the basis of a United Nations mandate and has been invited there by the government of Afghanistan".

Meanwhile, France, as EU president, expressed "consternation" over the reported deaths and Russia urged coalition forces to prevent further loss of life.

Joanna Nathan, an analyst from the International Crisis Group, told Al Jazeera the cabinet resolution is "really a call for more transparency and accountability" by the US and Nato, when there are "terrible and tragic mistakes".

"Throughout Afghanistan it raises deep concern and feeds into ideas of foreign resentment."

"But the vast majority of Afghans are more scared of what would happen if they leave."

Air force reliance

The attack in Herat on Sunday killed more than 90 civilians [FAP]
Daoud Sultanzoy, an Afghan MP, told Al Jazeera on Sunday that Nato should stop relying on air attacks when the Taliban are in villages and civilian areas.

"With either good or bad intelligence, the most important lesson to learn ... is that we need to rely more on ground troops.

"Since Nato and the coalition don't have these troops, the reliance on air support is greater.

"So, if they can increase their ground operations it would probably alleviate some of these problems.

"[The Taliban] don't have offices," he said.

"Regretfully, when a bombing takes place - an aerial bombing, or any kind of smart bombing - definitely, you will have regretful casualities."

International presence

Nearly 70,000 international soldiers from about 40 countries are in Afghanistan with a mandate to fight the Taliban and bring security to the country.

About 53,000 troops are with Isaf, mandated by the UN, with a resolution extended annually since 2003.

The agreement is due to be extended in October.

The remainder are with US-led forces under the banner of Operation Enduring Freedom, which unseated the Taliban.

A May 2005, a bilateral agreement between the US and Afghanistan outlined the coalition's operations including counter-terrorism operations, intelligence sharing and training the Afghan security forces.

France's defence minister, Herve Morin, said on Tuesday that he may return special forces to Afghanistan. France withdrew them in January 2007, but has 3,000 troops serving in Isaf.

Morin's comments came a week after 10 French soldiers were killed and 21 wounded, possibly due to friendly fire while fighting pro-Taliban elements.

Repeated discussions

The country's rights group, Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC), told Al Jazeera that 900 civilians have been killed this year alone in attacks and international military action.

Up until June, the Taliban were responsible for the larger part of casualities, but recent raids by the US and Nato have meant "the balance has changed", according to the AIHRC.

The country's cabinet statement said the government had "repeatedly" discussed the problems of harrassment and civilian deaths with foreign troops.

"Unfortunately, our demands have not been addressed, rather, more civilians, including women and children, are losing their lives as a result of air raids," it said.

Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, who on Sunday sacked two army officers over the Herat killings, told members of parliament on Monday about the cabinet's resolution and asked for a "national consensus" on the issue.

 Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
 
Topics in this article
Country

Organisation

Feedback Number of comments : 10
 
Robert
United States
26/08/2008
US Led Troops in Afghanistan
The US continues to have an all-volunteer military even though it has been in an unpopular war with questionable motives for over 5 years. When women and children are killed by soldiers it's a clear indication of the poor quality and immorality of the soldiers involved. The American soldiers there must be the of the lowest mentality. No one in their right mind would have voluntarily joined the American military since 2003.

pete
Afghanistan
26/08/2008
us and uk troops
i think the problem is that the us and uk troops dont got to the bomb sites after they have bombed them so they dont see/or want to see the aftermath of there actions i think if they had to see children/women dead they might check a bit more before realeaseing there power. also the talibunnys might not want to hide behind said women/children cowards i think

Braxton
United States
27/08/2008
Where does U.S. military get their numbers
So once again the U.S. military announces a successful air strike and confidently gives the casualty numbers. At what point will the media stop printing these lies. We've seen it before, 20 taliban killed, taliban leader killed, surgical strike, etc. etc. etc. In the end we learn that it was poor civilians and not the so called bad guys. The U.S. is a paper tiger that relies on technology without care for collateral damage. Cowards can't fight sandal wearing taliban without calling in air strike

Paulo
Afghanistan
27/08/2008
Nothing new
UN admits 90 afghan civilian deaths, most of them childrens, in US air bombing. Who cares?

Nick
United States
27/08/2008
"national consensus"
I certainly hope Karzai receives a national consensus asking the United States to leave Afghanistan. I'm growing weary of hearing how horrible the U.S. is, and how we're the world's worst terrorists when our fine young men and women are dying to protect those that do not appreciate it. Seeing the feedback from Afghanistan...it seems they're catching up to the U.S. in that their people already criticize the method in which they are kept free just as many Americans do. Good job!

Mikka Stalls
Benin
27/08/2008
bombings
doesnt this article show of the poor judgement of the afghan people as they continue to allow the shielding of these murders behind thier children and women. And by the way, how many of these children were future suicide bombers/taliban etc...dnc

hugh
United States
01/09/2008
afghans demand new rules of force
It saddens me to hear of civilian deaths in Afghanistan. With too few troops on the ground there has been an over-reliance on Airpower. Successful counterinsurgencies depend on lots of boots on the ground and positive engagement with the people.

Radya
Afghanistan
27/08/2008
US are not learn of the past when they loss in Vietnam. What Afganistan need is not force but food.

alam
Afghanistan
27/08/2008
children killed
we afghans are stupid to allow nato to kill our children. this is not the first time.nato has a policy of killing children and saying millitants. time to kick the devil out.

Ben
United Kingdom
27/08/2008
In Reply
Well let’s consider - we are not there to kill women and children or indeed any civilians but whilst the Taliban continue to use tactics of shielding behind civilians then it will of course cause collateral damage and civilian loss of life. We’re there for hearts and minds and to move these countries forward. I think it's about time the Afghans started realising that and start getting involved in their own future and fight the Taliban etc.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article
Aljazeera.net/english 2003 - 2010 ©
Designed & Developed by Aljazeera IT