UPDATED ON:
Sunday, September 21, 2008
14:58 Mecca time, 11:58 GMT
 
News CENTRAL/S. ASIA
Who was behind the Marriott blast?

The blast targeted a five-star hotel popular with Westerners [AFP]

Inteligence analysts and Pakistani officials have speculated that the suicide attack on Islamabad's Marriott hotel, which killed more than 50 people and left hundreds injured, was masterminded by al-Qaeda.

The hotel, part of an American-owned chain, was popular with Westerners and the Pakistani elite. A number of foreigners were among the dead.

The Pakistani interior ministry has blamed al-Qaeda, but no group has yet claimed responsibility for the attack.

 

Imtiaz Gul, a political analyst who was in the Marriott at the time

It's very obvious that the forces who the Pakistani authorities, as well as the Americans, are trying to hunt down - the Taliban, al-Qaeda, whatever name you give them their interests converge so every group that is against the United States and those who are co-operating with the United States their agenda has become one - attacked the targets.

They have chosen to attack the symbols of Western civilisation, choosing targets like hospitals and hotels - particularly the Marriott hotel where mostly foreigners stayed.

It's a very counterproductive move for these groups.  I think all they are up to is to destabilise the country, to create a feeling of instability in Pakistan.

Ayesha Siddiqa-Agha, an independent security and military analyst in Islamabad

What is the Taliban? Who are the militants? There are a whole bunch of militants who are operating in the country.

The Taliban, so far, have not taken responsibility, so it is the government that is saying so - but the previous government was equally quick to hold Baitullah Meshud [a pro-Taliban Pakistani fighter] and the Taliban responsible for [former prime minister] Benzir Bhutto's death last year.

We don't know who's done it. Let's not be that hurried to judge who's behind it.

Investigators hope to uncover evidence of who was responsible for the attack [AFP]
Pakistan has a new president, yes, but there is no change in policy. Whatever Pervez Musharraf, the former president, was doing is happening now ... the same thing is being repeated.

I think the Americans don't trust the Pakistani military at the moment. They're trying to set up this one-window operation through President Asif Ali Zardari - therefore he has just shot off to the US a few hours after the attack - but I don't think they have the confidence that he can deliver.

They believe there are elements within the military which are supporting the Taliban and supporting the militants.

This blast in Islamabad was a case of a security lapse. They [the security forces] manage to protect the parliament and the presidency, but what about the Marriott or the Serena - these are the two five-star hotels where many foreigners go?

I am suddenly reminded of an incident many years ago when General Zia ul-Haq [Pakistani president from 1978-1988] went out on a bike ride, and while he was doing that, the American embassy was set on fire. This is a case of a security lapse - to protect the VIPs of Pakistan you allow the threat to go somewhere else.

This was a high security risk area and there was very little security. After the blast, when we went around town, the checkpoints had been abandoned by the police.

And the city itself is not in a position to cater to such kind of a crisis. The fire brigade, for example, did not arrive in time and did not have the facilities to put out the fire so the entire hotel burnt down.

Mosharraf Zaidi, a political analyst based in Kabul, the Afghan capital

I don't know if it's appropriate to call this Pakistan's 9/11. I think Pakistan has been having mini-9/11s regularly since the actual 9/11.

I think there's been a fundamental failure within the Washington establishment - and in London and other global capitals - about what Pakistani society and the Pakistani state needs to deal with this.

Certainly both the state and Pakistani society have made mistakes ... Those mistakes need to be corrected and it's important that the international community, particularly the US, step up the level of their assistance.

Inside Pakistan, I certainly think there'll be a much more resolute political response to this than we've had in the past.  But I'm not sure that the mobilisation of Pakistani public opinion will take place in the same way it did [in the US] after 9/11.

Certainly any of Pakistan's English-speaking, urban and expat elite - and by elite I don't mean economic elite, but 'opinion elite' - any of those people who were sitting on the fence are certainly going to be pushed off it by this explosion.

But what I don't think will happen - I don't think Pakistan's religious parties are going to get with programme. I think they are going to continue to ask for an end to the operation in Bajaur [a district in Pakistan's tribal region where the Pakistani military is battling pro-Taliban and al-Qaeda-linked fighters].

 Source: Al Jazeera
 
Feedback Number of comments : 3
 
jahid
India
22/09/2008
What are the reasons?
Its the need of the hour that we should think over the reasons behind these attacks across world these days. Just compare between the situation before 10-15 years ago and now. Is this kind of attacks on decrease? Is the world is safer after "war on terror"? Can prevailant policies prevent further attacks? and so...many questions arise when we look into the past and compare the situation. Injustice, corruption, double standard are root cause of terrorism..r u hearing?

Nathan G.
United States
23/09/2008
Terrorism
While I whole-heartedly condemn terrorism, I believe that the actions of the U.S. currently are only breeding more terrorists. If you look at the history of the world, no peoples of any race want to be occupied. The longer the U.S. keeps large amounts of soldiers in Iraq, Afghanistan, among other places, then the peoples of those countries will only grow to hate the U.S. more and more each day. It seems like the U.S. is, in and of itself, breeding terrorism in those parts of the world.

SAINTCUTE
Pakistan
23/09/2008
Al Qaeda / TTP ?
Pro+Pro(More than Musharaf's tenure) US government has assured maximum support against war on terror and this has stimulated the venom stored amongst the anti-US forces.....certainly the ones US/NATO has expanded incursions would retaliate in whatever way possible to express their anger & hatred plus the threat to fight back and it is a scary situation now,which requires immense amount of foolproof security measures to be taken into immediate action!Its a charade,Two faces of the same coin.AQTTP

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article