UPDATED ON:
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
20:57 Mecca time, 17:57 GMT
News CENTRAL/S. ASIA
Afghan reporter spared execution
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld Kambakhsh's conviction on Tuesday [AFP]

A young Afghan journalist has been spared execution after an appeal court overturned the death sentence handed down for his conviction for blasphemy by a provincial court earlier this year.

However, the appeal court the conviction on Tuesday and replaced the death penalty with a 20-year prison term.

Perwiz Kambakhsh was arrested one year ago in the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif for distributing an internet article that was described as questioning central tenets of Islam and the rights of women in Islamic communities.

Kambakhsh's arrest and sentencing has drawn condemnation from both the Afghan and western media and human rights groups, leading to calls for the president, Hamid Karzai to intervene.

The primary court in the northern province of Balkh passed down the death penalty after finding him guilty in January this year.

'Insulting questions'

The three-judge panel unanimously overturned the death sentence, but upheld the blasphemy conviction, after hearing evidence from a number of witnesses, including five of lecturers at Balkh University, where Kambakhsh was a student.

The lecturers told the court that Kambakhsh had asked them questions they believed to be insulting to Islam. One, Mohammad Yasseen, accused Kambakhsh of disrupting his classes by asking "hostile, careless and rude questions about Islam".

However, a classmate, identified only as Hamid, told the court his testimony at the first trial had been made under pressure from the country's intelligence department.

The reporter had previously alleged he was tortured during his one-year detention and said his original trial lasted just minutes and that he was given no legal representation.

"The court has sentenced Mr Perwiz Kambakhsh to 20 years jail for the crime he has committed. But this is not the final hearing, he has the right to appeal," Abdul Salaam Qazizada, one of the judges, told the court on Tuesday.

Kambaksh and his lawyer, Mohammad Afzal Shormach Nuristani, confirmed they would lodge an appeal against the jail sentence.

Paris-based media watchdog Reporters without Borders said Afghan justice had failed to protect Afghan law and guarantee free expression.
   
"By sentencing this young journalist to imprisonment, the appeal court has eliminated the possibility of his being executed, but it has also exposed the degree to which some Afghan judges are susceptible to pressure from fundamentalists," it said.

 Source: Agencies
 
Topics in this article
People

Organisation

Feedback Number of comments : 7
 
Victor
United States
21/10/2008
Reporters never learn
Reporters have freedom only in democratic countries. Just because they can criticize western countries in their countries would mean they can criticize the Fundamentalist in Afghanistan. Wake up reporters, press freedom is a privelege, not a right in many Islamic countries but it's OK to call the US "The Great Satan". Wake up fools, they're with you right now.

Sherylou
Canada
22/10/2008
Something is Missing ~ Guaranteed
No, this story is missing some crucial component. I know about Islam and I know about blasphemy. But here there is an absence of the court's MOTIVES, especially when we read that the first trial was very short. We are missing some central information. It sounds as though he was already an enemy of the court. I am neither defending nor attacking anyone I am simply saying this is a story with a big hole in it. It's not the complete picture.

Allan Self
Afghanistan
22/10/2008
civil society
These charges of blasphemy by kangaroo courts are an excuse to silence a political critic. Afghanistan has a literacy rate below 30%. You can't build a civil society on such a foundation.

Tom
Afghanistan
23/10/2008
Whats missing
I was in Afghanistan when this guy got his death sentence. What’s missing Shery?? He insulted Islam and in that nation that’s all it takes to get death sentence. And that was what the Afghans told me. 20 years in prison for something you OR I wouldn’t think twice about. You surprised?? Ayub – what a crock! Agree w/ DK – you won’t find a nation with a higher level of freedom of reporting – truths, half-truths, pure lies - than the US. I’ve been THERE, I doubt that you’ve been HERE.

MB
Canada
21/10/2008
Hmm, sounds familiar
Victor's comment is rather correct, with one problem: I thought the reason that International Forces are IN Afghanistan is to remove the Taliban, because the Taliban were ultra-religious fundemendalists. Did we seriously replace them with a group of crazies just as radical?

Ayub
Afghanistan
22/10/2008
Afghan justice..
VICTOR:What rights are you talking about?..Everything is controlled by the govt these days..Phil Donahue's short lived show was cancelled because he was a conscientious objector and his show was based on the idea to expose the(crooked)US govt and it's actions in Iraq and Afghanistan.Democracy in the US media is a thing of the past..I think you need to wake up.As far as Perwiz is concerned,he was probably coached/paid by US officials and now he is paying for someone else's mistake/propaganda.

DK
United States
23/10/2008
Democracy in journalism???
Ayub, you have to stop believing all the Taliban-approved media reports from your country. The US government doesn't have the power to shut down Phil Donohue. Lack of ratings and revenue is the only authority with such power in the U.S. Take a glance at ANY U.S. media outlet and you will QUICKLY find that the media is the harshest critics of the US government and policy. Unlike your country, government and RELIGIOUS censorship is virtually non-existent in the US. Money talks. Period.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article
Aljazeera.net/english 2003 - 2010 ©
Designed & Developed by Aljazeera IT