UPDATED ON:
Thursday, December 25, 2008
01:38 Mecca time, 22:38 GMT
 
News CENTRAL/S. ASIA
Polls close in Indian Kashmir vote

Security was tight in Srinagar and its outskirts on Wednesday for the election's final phase [AFP]

Polls have closed in Indian Kashmir's main city, bringing to an end the  final phase of state elections marked by low turnout and clashes between police and groups of separatists.

Elections were held on Wednesday in both Srinagar, the Muslim-majority summer capital of Indian Kashmir, and Jammu, the province's Hindu-majority winter capital.

The run-up to the vote had been overshadowed by heightened tension between India and Pakistan, which both claim Kashmir, after last month's Mumbai attacks.

India deployed thousands of police and troops in case of separatist violence in Kashmir.

In Srinagar, the heart of a nearly 20-year separatist campaign against Indian rule, police said 15 people were injured when police clashed with stone-throwing protesters in three areas.

Three police were among the injured.

Police responded with batons and teargas.

Scattered clashes

A high turnout in the previous six rounds of the election, which began on November 17, had encouraged Indian authorities despite the scattered clashes between separatists and government forces.

Nearly 1.7 million voters were eligible to cast their votes in the last phase.

At least 393 candidates contested elections for 87 assembly seats across the state, with 21 in total up for grabs in Jammu and Srinagar cities.

"Overall the voting was peaceful and the turnout is considerably higher than in 2002 elections," Kulbushan Jandail, the Jammu and Kashmir government's chief spokesman, said.

Officials said there had been a 13 per cent voter turnout by mid-afternoon.

The final turnout figures will be released later on Wednesday, with the statewide poll results expected on Sunday.

Disappointing end

Al Jazeera's Divya Gopalan, reporting from Srinagar, said: "Authorities will see this as a disappointing end to the Kashmir state elections. Voter turnout has been low, especially when compared to the previous six phases, when voters came out in unprecedented numbers.
 
"There has also been sporadic violence, when protesters clashed with troops. This is despite the heavy presence of security forces in and around the city."
 

Separatists held protests against the vote in Srinagar, where turnout was low [AFP]
She said separatist groups had called for a boycott of these elections, arguing that the vote did not address the wider issue of Kashmir's future.
 
"But the voters we spoke to said they were casting their ballots for basic amenities, like better roads, schools and hospitals," she said.

Many polling stations in Srinagar remained virtually empty throughout the day, especially in the city centre.

But there was a cheerful mood on the city's outskirts as voters queued outside, dressed in flowing woollen robes to keep out the winter chill.

Kuldeep Khoda, director-general of Kashmir police, said that intelligence intercepts indicated that "terrorists and separatists" would try to disrupt voting.

In Srinagar, police and soldiers armed with assault rifles blocked off lanes with razor wire and iron barricades, while sniffer dogs searched polling booths for bombs.

Indian police said on Tuesday they had arrested three fighters, one of them a Pakistani soldier, for allegedly planning a suicide attack during the vote but Pakistan denied the man was a serving soldier.

Vote criticised

Kashmiri separatist leaders, many of them under detention, had called for a boycott of the polls.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, the chairman of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference, which wants Kashmir's independence or merger with Pakistan, condemned the heavy security presence for the elections.

"I don't believe that under the barrel of the gun, any election has credibility when there are no observers or international community involved," said Mirwaiz Omar Farooq, who is under house arrest.

"The majority of the people have boycotted the elections because they don't address the key issues that people want to be addressed."

 Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Feedback Number of comments : 7
 
Dhirendra K. Pabari
Tanzania
25/12/2008
Jammu, Ladakh, Kashmir & POK
Hello, I see one consistency when your channel gives news about Kashmir i.e. being ani-Indian. Even the riots by Hindus re their right to build rest houses at Amarnath were protrayed as anti Indian riots. And you seem to have forgotten the basic FACTS: UN's resolutions for plebecite in Kashmir requires Pakistan to vacate J&K, Kashmir incl. 6 major regions, Kashmiri Hindus are yet to return to valley, Art. 370 protects the state identity, no migrants have settled there unlike West bank, etc. Thx.

Dhirendra K. Pabari
Tanzania
25/12/2008
Jammu, Kashmir, Ladakh & POK
Would you not like to take referendum in POK, Sindh, Baluchistan and NWFP if they wish to remain as parts of Pakistan. I respect your channel and enjoy watching it compared to many others. But when it comes to Kashmir, you have only negative image to give India. Have you ever surveyed POK and asked those original Kashmiris about their aspirations? And what about the rights of other minorities thrown out of J&K? And do you want Hindus & Buddhists to accept complete Arabisation of Jammu & Ladakh?

Scott T Moree II
United States
27/12/2008
J and K reporting.
I do not detect the bias in this article that Dhirendra accuses. I am sure there are many perspectives on the elections and overall situation in J&K and with that plenty of people who will gripe and feel upset that theirs is not matching up with the article. I would caution you to discuss the arab-isation as you call it of J&K as that will only lead down a long road of volatile religion oriented argumentation and dilute any actual input you may have.

hilalahmed
India
27/12/2008
Kashmir, what?
The 20 year old separatist movement showed no results, while it continues to harp. People, as an interim measure want good governance. So, it is elections. However, there is fragmentation in all ranks - pro-indian, anti-indian, pro-pak, anti-pak, pro-independece, greater-autonomy. Elections elect a representative government, and not the representatives to decide the past, present or future of Kashmir question. Let new government surge ahead in good governance, and mitigate the problems of people

Navin kuamr Yadav
United States
28/12/2008
Kashmir election
All party Hurriysat conference people are pay roll roll employee of Pakistan sponsor terrirists group. In Kasmir muslims are living better life than muslims in Pakistan. In modern time whre there is a global village concept and border does not matter much its better Hurriyast conference put energy for the welfare of Kasmiris.

Fayaz Malik
United Kingdom
28/12/2008
Kashmir Elections and Kashmir What
It is about basic right of freedom for Kashmiries which Naveen is not aware or isn intentionally forgetting. Kashmir needs freedom from Indian rule and then we will have open borders with India under gloabl Village concept. Indian puppet governments have worsened the situation in Kashmir for last 60years and any new government is not going to do any miracles, which my brother Hilal is forgetting. Lets stand together for independence which will prevail.

Mangesh
India
29/12/2008
Kashmeer
Dear readers, I agree with Dhirender that aljazeera has a biased reporting related to Kashmir. Higher voter turnout upto 60% were also seen in other Indian Hindu majority states. So Kashmir is none the exception apart this indicates the people desire to participate in the democratic exercise and decide their own future.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article