UPDATED ON:
Thursday, July 31, 2008
02:16 Mecca time, 23:16 GMT
 
News Europe
Turkey ruling party escapes ban

The head of the court said the ruling was a "serious warning" to the party [AFP]

Turkey's highest court has announced that it will not close down the governing Justice and Development party on charges of undermining the country's secular system.

Six of the court's 11 judges voted in favour of closing down the party, just one short of the seven required to impose a ban, Hasim Kilic, the head of the constitutional court, said.

But the court, he stressed, was still sending the party, also known as the AK party, a "serious warning" by cutting half of the treasury funds it was entitled to this year.

"The decision was a warning, a serious warning," he said.

The AK party which was re-elected with 47 per cent of the vote last year, had denied charges of violating the secular constitution.

The case first reached the court in March and final deliberations had begun on Monday.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey's prime minister, said the ruling had removed the uncertainty that the country had been facing, but that Turkey had suffered a serious loss of time and energy due to the case.

In his first remarks since the court's decision, Erdogan said his party would continue to uphold the country's secular values.

"The Justice and Development party, which has never been a focal point of anti-secular activities, will continue to defend the basic principles of the republic," he said.

Public debate

Hoda Abdel-Hamid, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Ankara, the Turkish capital, said the case had triggered an intense debate in the country over the past month, revealing a much deeper issue.

"It reflected a more profound problem within Turkish society... how to have the overwhelming masses, who are religiously sensitive without being fundamentalist - and without wanting to change the secular tenants of this state - be able to co-habitate with the secular elite who are extremely afraid that the AK Party will slowly try to Islamise society.

"That would be a process that would be irreversible," she said.

Fadi Hakura, a Turkish analyst with the London-based Royal Institute of International Affairs, said that the government could face a crisis again if it continued pursuing what he said was their previous agenda of more religion.

"Even if the party was banned this time around, it would have been seen as the last time that such an event could take place in Turkey. Turkey is changing," Hakura said.

"It's becoming much more of a pluralistic society and so any kind of military intervention is now more frowned upon by the public.

"Turkey is also now much more exposed to international financial markets, is involved in the European Union accession process and in regional engagement in the Middle East."

The EU had criticised the case, saying the kind of charges raised by the prosecutor should have been debated in parliament and decided through the ballot box, not in the courtroom.

Financial markets had rallied on optimism over the past week that the court would decide not to ban the party.

The lira rose as much as two per cent against the dollar and shares gained four per cent.

 Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Feedback Number of comments : 18
 
ewan
Malaysia
30/07/2008
admirable..
i really respect Tayyip erdogan in his act to lift the scarf ban although he do know that will faced huge opposition from other faction..a huge gamble for a person in his position..

Hameed
Maldives
30/07/2008
This clearly shows that Turkey has a long way to go before it could join the EU. And also at the same time, it can now be said that Kemalism is a dying ideology which will go into history books similar to Marxism, Leninism or whatever someone might call it.

salauddin
Bangladesh
30/07/2008
set them free
if turkey calls it self democracy, than there shouldn't be any imposed laws of any dress code from the government. people should allow to wear what they want, if womens wants to wear hejab and go to school & work than let it be, this is their right and it should be respected. the majority of the turks wants freedom from any imposed dress code laws form the elite secular minorities. let them be free.

k.
Afghanistan
31/07/2008
judgment or warning?
This court ruling is freaky. Courts decide either for or against a party, but don’t “warn” anybody, that’s not the role f a court.

Ali
United Kingdom
31/07/2008
AKP
This so called Constitutional Court is no more than a kangaroo court set up by the Kemalist Secularists to protect their selfish interests. A proper court should be above politics. Warning an elected party is proof of lack of freedom in Turkey. As a citizen of EU, I would not recommend the acceptance of Turkey into EU unless and until proper human rights are established and the influence of sinister secularists and the army has diminished.

Naseem
Kenya
31/07/2008
An democtratic desition
Dear Sir / Madams Due to my view point is that the akP Leader might not be concerned at all about the concerning the tradition and culture that's why they have to make a change due to the opportunities that they have and not to loss that chance even thought they will face some corraptions and problems but the fact is according the goverment and the citizens.

Nadeem
United Kingdom
31/07/2008
Scarf
I think, Turkey should hold a referendum over scarf.

aise
Turkey
31/07/2008
better thah worst
Being a turkish, I can say I am not pleased for the court decision.To me judging a ruling party was a mistake from the very begining by showing silly reasons to have it closed down.AKP will go ahead but this judgement took Turkey a fex steps back .Lets say it could be worse and consider the court decision as BETTER THAN WORST .

Salahudin
France
31/07/2008
Turkey ruling party court judgement
Very good court judgement. Next time, the ruling party will think thrice before voting any proislamist laws . Long live Ataturk and his secularism!

Mehmet Ali Gökaçti
Turkey
31/07/2008
democracy will over come
To establish of the democratic rules is looking like to walk in the long road. We need to time. If you make a comparison with the western countries, Turkey is a new and young democracy. There are some problems of course in this process. We will accept this process would be a bit difficult. Struggels of the democracy never have been easy during the history. Same thing is valid for the Turkey. But, we can prefer everybody to look the full part of the glass now. Democracy will exactly over come.

sohaib
Afghanistan
01/08/2008
what is democracy?
If we consider democracy as a better political system, as the whole world is calling for, then let it be practiced on the land. Democracy is the rule of people on the people. if there is consistent interference of secular courts and army in all affairs of the government, then there is no democracy.the current government is elected by people and turks are basically muslims and it was once the center of islamic caliphate. why their demands are not fulfilled if they want headscarf and islamic life?

jamal
United Kingdom
01/08/2008
Turkey ruling party escapes ban
if there would have been a ban, then the turkish people eventually would have gone into riot and anarchy against the courts and the army, therefore we see that Kemaist dictatorship just bought themselves little more time(delay tactics no strategy)secularism is on the way ou(thank god).

adel mazen
United States
30/07/2008
AK party
Salamo 3alaikom : Turky has an identity problem , only democratic processcan help it- ie - the ballet box , they should learn to vote on any and every thing , other wise it is by name or by other name a dictator ship, salamo 3alaikom 3adel

bintu saffini
Afghanistan
31/07/2008
just plain sad
its sad to see the once (insert-ur-own-adjective-here)Ottoman Empire sunk to this level. Kamal Attaturk's legacy will live on. Hope he's happy now

Turkoglu
Azerbaijan
31/07/2008
Kemalist loser!!!
new era for the turks, the corrupt secularist knew that their happy life will come to an end. kemalist is thing of the past now. AKP is the turky's future.

Suat Aktas
Turkey
31/07/2008
It was not a simple verdict
That decision Turkey's top court issued actually was not a verdict of the court. Due to many pressures and sometimes threats from EU and the USA regarding the closure case against the ruling party (Justice and Development Party), Turkey Constitutional Court was forced to decide the party must not be shut down. if the party was closed, negotiations (between Turkey and EU) would be cut. if the party was closed, the strategic cooperation (between Turkey-USA) would be damaged.

Kelly fraser
United Kingdom
31/07/2008
freedom fo women
define freedom? if turkey has freedom then why is their 1 ideology (Ataturk ). Erodgan has done well because he allowed freedom which is what he requires to join the EU.

Gokturk
Turkey
31/07/2008
Serious Warning
Judgement: "AKP is undermining the country's secular system." Yes, i agree the Great Court. Tayyip is trying to make us like malasia or iran. We are the great Turkish people. We are secular. Secularism is in our hearts. State is different, religion is different things. We cant tolerate anything which damages secularism. We are the most developed country in islamic states. Why? Because we have secularism. Kemalism will live forever.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article