UPDATED ON:
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
22:12 Mecca time, 19:12 GMT
News Europe
Russia praises EU's approach

Lavrov, left, said Russia did not discriminate against Turkey in trade relations [AFP]


Russia has praised the European Union for taking a "responsible approach" to its conflict with Georgia by declining to impose sanctions on Moscow.

But Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian president, said the EU had failed to understand Moscow's reasons for moving into Georgia and recognising the separitist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

"In my view, the outcome is double-edged," Medvedev said at his summer residence on the Black Sea.

"This is sad, but not fatal because things change in this world. Another situation, in my opinion, is more positive.

"Despite certain divisions among the EU states on the issue, a reasonable, realistic point of view prevailed because some of the states were calling for some mythical sanctions."

He later said that he does not consider Mikhail Saakashvili to be Georgia's president, in an interview with a Russian television channel.

"For us, the present Georgian regime has collapsed. President Saakashvili no longer exists in our eyes. He is a political corpse," Medvedev said.

EU leaders met in Brussels on Monday to discuss Russia and Georgia and threatened to postpone talks with Moscow on a new partnership pact if it did not withdraw its troops to pre-conflict positions in Georgia by mid-September.

The leaders were unable to reach a consensus on the sanctions that some members, including Britain and the Baltic states, had been pushing for, highlighting the bloc's divisions over how best to deal with its largest energy supplier.

Cheney visit

Ahead of a visit by Dick Cheney, the US vice president, to US allies in the region, a Kremlin aide said he expected Washington would also opt against imposing sanctions.

Cheney, due to leave on Tuesday for Azerbaijan, Georgia and Ukraine, has been an outspoken critic of Russia, saying last month its push into Georgia could "not go unanswered".

Sergei Prikhodko, chief foreign policy advisor to Medvedev, told reporters:"We hope that a positive agenda in relations with the United States will prevail."

Cheney has been an outspoken critic of Russia since the war broke out [EPA]

The statements contained none of the strident remarks made by Kremlin officials in the run-up to the EU summit.

It also appeared designed to signal Moscow's readiness to take a conciliatory stance with western countries if they also avoid confrontation.

Russia sent its forces against its southern neighbour in a brief war last month after Georgia tried to recapture by force its pro-Moscow, separatist region of South Ossetia.

It has drawn Western condemnation by pushing beyond the disputed area, bombing and deploying troops deep inside Georgia proper and recognising the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Russia said it was forced to intervene to prevent what it has called a genocide of the separatist regions by Tbilisi, and says it is honouring a French-brokered ceasefire deal.

The former Soviet republic of Georgia is strategically important to the West because it hosts oil and gas pipelines that bypass Russia.

 Source: Agencies
 
Topics in this article
People

Country

City

Organisation

Feedback Number of comments : 12
 
Michelle
United States
03/09/2008
Russia-Georgia conflict
In all the articles I've read on the subject, I've never received a satisfatory explaination of one important fact. Why did Saakashvili attack Ossetia, and by extension Russia? How could he not be aware of how forcefully Russia would respond? I'm still looking for answers.

Joe
United States
03/09/2008
The changing of the guard
I think it's a strange thing we are seeing, It seem more and more the EU is where problems are being worked out. Is the EU now taking the place of the UN, in fact is this the new UN?

Sherpa
Canada
02/09/2008
Who cares what Cheney says hes a chronic Liar
Cheney has been an outspoken critic of Russia since the war broke out [EPA]. That's ok DICK Cheney is a FAT LIAR!!

prakash
Nepal
03/09/2008
There is a reason to believe on that all news agency are not biased
Aljazeera has been a greater source for me to access the news on the Russia- Georgia conflict . In my view,EU should take diplomatic approach on this crisis not because it's the main energy supplier for the European countries, but because Russian have take such step to answer the attack on the common civilan of the South - ossetia and its peace troops by the Georgian barbian so called "Political corpse". EU should deal this crisis with proper diplomatic dialogues

Charly
Nigeria
03/09/2008
on the Russian and Georgian conflict
The Russian government should not have enter into a direct confrontation with the Georgian government. They should have called for dialogue or truce between Geogia and the south Ossetian separatist. The Russians should have played a better role in such negotiations other than the use of force to invade Georgia. Pulling back her troops into the pre-conflict position and entering into dialogue could help bring peace and chart away forward for south Ossetia

katrina
Russian Federation
04/09/2008
it is so refreshing to find a news agency that cares about the truth & dose not take political sides,i'm a half arab half russin living in russia,it made me so angry to see what the westren news said about the georgan conflict,they made russia the bad guy & didnt bother to show the people who actually were the victims of the georgians army,they attacked we simply fought back..& that is that!thank you for your efforts to show the truth & not the politics.

Miguel Lopez
Philippines
06/09/2008
A resurging Russia is needed to balance the situation as the WEST lead by the US is slowly devouring all nations on its influence. You may see that the WEST are moving eastward of europe, parts of the middle like iraq and afganistan. Soon other parts of asia and africa.

Henry
United Kingdom
04/09/2008
Georgia is a pawn
Russia is flexing its political muscle by invading Georgia. Perhaps it is to help South Ossetia, perhaps not. Whatever the reasons, there are innocent people of South Ossetia and Georgia whose blood has been spilt in order that Russia may assert its dominance. This blood has been spilt by Georgians and Russians alike. War is cruel and does not forment peace. Ask the Americans! they have often tried to bring peace by the gun, and has it ever worked?

Alex
Germany
05/09/2008
Why did Georgia attack South Ossetia?
One of my previous speakers posed the question why Georgia attacked SouthOssetia at all? I am puzzled about this thing, too. Russia DECLARED only DAYS before the failed invasion that it would react. And Saakaschwili still gave the orders. That was just so crude and an irresponsible risk to take. I do not understand wtf came over Saakaschwili to do that...

Ross
Afghanistan
05/09/2008
Walk Light
Why does the US goverment continue to stick there nose into any and every disagrement and or conflict. I wish we would pull out of the worlds afairs. Unfortunetly its going to take the world ganging up on us and kicking our butts before this happens. No sanctions on Russia you idiots in Washington.

andrey
Russian Federation
05/09/2008
“August Syndrome” has bitten westerners from their worries about how Nabucco pipeline project - a pipeline from the Caspian Sea carrying gas through Turkey to the West to avoid the traditional route through Russia and its satellites - would be jeopardized by the independence of Southern Ossetia and Abkhazia. Such Syndrome can be seen in the history - invasion of Iraq – for creating collective security and safeguards from Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Jonathan
Philippines
05/09/2008
Mass Deception
The Georgian Pres. was so confident that the Americans will back him up when he tried to invade the 2 separatist states, Unfortunately, the Americans didn't do so, cause there is not much of an interest esp. in resources in Georgia. Georgia was being taken as a dummy by the U.S. govt. Unlike Iraq, the Americans were persistent to attack and produce all the lies, just to tell the people around the world that there is a Weapon of Mass Destruction in Iraq, but up to now I haven't seen any proof

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article
Aljazeera.net/english 2003 - 2010 ©
Designed & Developed by Aljazeera IT