UPDATED ON:
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
18:35 Mecca time, 15:35 GMT
 
News Middle East
Iran replies to EU nuclear package

Iran is under pressure to stop its nuclear enrichment programme [EPA]

Iran has delivered its reply to proposals laid out by EU officials aimed at defusing the row over Tehran's nuclear programme.

The "written response" was handed to EU officials in Brussels on Tuesday, according to Iran's Fars news agency, but the message is thought to avoid mention of a freeze on Iran's nuclear work.

"The letter does not mention the freeze-for-freeze issue," the Reuters news agency quoted a senior Iranian official as saying.

The freeze is a step Western powers have demanded if Iran is to avoid more UN sanctions.

Seyed Mohammed Marandi, from the University of Tehran, told Al Jazeera: "The five-plus-one proposal has a number of ambiguities that the Iranians feel that until they are resolved properly, Iran cannot respond properly to the proposal itself."

The "five-plus-one" powers are Britain, China, France, Russia, the US and Germany - the six countries involved in the negotiations.

"Iran is trying to resolve these ambiguities and I think this letter is part of that process," Marandi said.

No 'clear response'

Iran's "written response" has not been seen as a formal reply to the EU proposals.

A US spokesman said negotiators from the "five-plus-one" were due to hold a conference call on Wednesday to decide their next move.

Gonzalo Gallegos, as US state department spokesman, said: "If we are not going to receive a clear response, a clear message from them, we are going to have no choice but to pursue additional measures."

Elahe Mohtasham, a nuclear specialist from the Foreign Policy Centre in London, told Al Jazeera that Iran's position "hasn't really changed as far as any suspension of its nuclear centrifuge activity is concerned".

"The best bet - in terms of the interests of the West - is to start negotaitons without any precondiditions ... and then in the course of negotations maybe we will be able to get more concessions from Iran," she said.

"Sanctions haven't worked and are very unlikely to work. Any further sanctions would really increase the price of oil and wouldn't benefit the world economy."

Deadline passed

The UK had warned that a lack of a positive answer from Tehran by the end of Tuesday would prompt the six powers to ask the UN Security Council to take further punitive measures.

The new deadline was set after Iran ignored a previous demand to respond by last weekend to the proposed package.

The UN has already imposed three sets of sanctions against Iran over the dispute.

Tensions were again heightened on Monday, Iran said it had successfully test-fired an anti-ship missile with a range of 300km that would allow it to close the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and Oman.

General Mohammad Ali Jafari, the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, said: "No enemy vessels would be able to escape it."

Tehran has steadfastly refused to suspend its uranium-enrichment activities, which it says are aimed only at producing fuel for nuclear power production.

Western powers fear the programme is a cover for developing nuclear weapons.

 Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Feedback Number of comments : 18
 
ebrahima gitteh
Senegal
05/08/2008
Hey iran people be glad with your excellency ahmed he is a patriot be with him for your own interest

Stranger
United States
05/08/2008
The wrong way
Iran is heading down a bad road. Israel is creative enough to pull off a major assault on Iran's military facilities, which will then cause Iran to try and close the straight which will then drag the US into this war. People forget that it's easy to destroy things and Iran has much to lose. The most ridiculous part of this whole affair is that if Iran were to stop threatening Israel and stop waging proxy wars through Lebanon and Palestine. No one would care if they had nuclear weapons.

Jason
United States
05/08/2008
More then bias
We dont worry about Israel's nuclear weapons, or that they are threatening preemptive strikes on Iran, but we worry and threaten 'action' or sanction against Iran for a nuclear program that shows no evidence of supporting a weapons program. Two factors that sum up the US situation 1. War is money for big companies, 2. The Israel lobby in the US is very powerful, there is no Iranian lobby. I hope that Iran may continue to be a more peaceful nation then the US.

Ali Azadeh
Afghanistan
05/08/2008
Iran Rights
I think Iran has the undisputable right to nuclear technology and it is not western colonialists business to interfere. They better go clean their own mess in their own countries and elsewhere.

Robin Chase
United States
05/08/2008
Iran
The Western powers only shout demands and never listen to reason. Iran is coming across as the one shining light in this confrontation of words.

Iranian
United States
05/08/2008
Iranian people don't want nuclear program or a nuclear bomb. This is costing Iranian people a lot of pain. They want jobs, food, and housing and a stop to out of control inflation. I have no doubt that Iranian regime wants the bomb even if it costs lives and the destruction of IRAN.

tom
Botswana
05/08/2008
iran
maj, it is far too late to come out unscathed.....the iranian people suffer today for the pride of the men who lead them. you hatred of the west is affirmed by these men.....the islamic world needs more women in power. moral high ground? neither iran nor america can rightly claim it.

John Earls
Peru
05/08/2008
Iran and the 6
For Iran to meekly agree to the demand of giving up uranium enrichment would be the statement of the formal breakdown of international law and its replacement by the arbitrary authoritarianism of US military dictates. Under the NPT Iran has this right while Israel and India haven't. The US decrees that the latter can illegally enrich for bombs while Iran can't legally enrich for energy. This is a very dangerous precedent for the world.

ICE_MAN
United States
05/08/2008
This is not about morales?
The arguement over Iran's nuclear programme has nothing to do with morales. So to say they have the moral high-ground is somewhat cynical. If 6 world powers have united to speak as one against Iran, I think it's quiet clear that for Iran to come out of this unscathed will mean they will have to compromise soon. No one is attacking Iran's rights over it's so-called civilian nuclear aspirations, it is the military aspirations and threats to global peace that are of most importance.

Matteo Sturnig
Canada
06/08/2008
Iran Replies to EU Nuclear Package
If Iran is fighting from "high moral grounds", they why to their male population suppress their women, forbid them an education, do not grant them voting rights, believe their bodies are taunts from the Devil? Seems to me this "high moral ground" is nothing more that male insecurities, a return to slavery movement of the last century.

mohsen
United States
05/08/2008
Iran replies to EU
Iran will stay their ground and, God-willing, they will expose the true faces of world's colonialist, nuclear powers. Isn't it amazing that US-India nuclear deals takes place freely despite the fact that India has the weapon and refuses to sign the NPT, just like Israel and Pakistan. But, Iran, despite being a signatory of NPT, is refused the right to have nuclear technology of her own. The main reason is that Iran is Muslim. That's what bothers the West. Muslims should boycott western products.

Alek
Germany
06/08/2008
Sovereign States have no obligations to the 5 + 1
Like Iraq possesed Weapons of Mass Destruction so does Iran follow a nuclear program for military purposes.Iran's diplomacy and non-transparency gives the West uncertainty about its intentions.But Europe has the same uncertainty with the US - you never know which country they will bomb next.Iran is potrayed as the aggressive country,but if we stick to facts and look which country waged most wars after WW2 there is only one answer Nuclear energy is cleaner as coal anyway!Iran is Pro-environment!

maj gen aps chauhan
India
05/08/2008
iran
Iran will come out unscathed in this unequal fight with West. It fights from a moral high ground .

Riaz Ahmad
United Kingdom
05/08/2008
Iran and nuclear weapons
Israel is part of middle east, it is not a member of NPT, but the west is quite happy for Israel to have nuclear weapons. so what moral right has the west, or on what moral grounds does the west deny iran nuclear weapons. US is the only state that ever used nuclear weapons it should be the first one to be disarmed of such weapons. It clear that the whole case against Iran is nothing but utterly shameless hypocricy.

Neil
United States
05/08/2008
I hope in this day and age that diplomacy will prevail over fear, aggression, and intolerance. Conflict is not the answer it is not best for the middle east, nor is it best for the women, children, and the future generations of Iranians. I support Iran and it's right to make peaceful energy, however without discourse between world leaders, fear, aggression, and intolerance are all that remain.

r rumjen
France, Metropolitan
05/08/2008
iran nuclear programme
The west has been bullying nations for years, Iran is not doing anything wrong and should stick to their programme. Persia was a great power at one time. This simply the circle of destiny. They will be a great power again for the benefit of manking

HOW
Afghanistan
05/08/2008
Iran replies to EU nuclear package
How about sanction on the U.S. and U.K. for violation of the NPT?

Hohaia
New Zealand (Aotearoa)
05/08/2008
What I have trouble comprehending is that if it wasn't for an infamous Israeli whistleblower the world would still be in the dark about Israels nuclear weapons. Hypocrisy is par for the course in the western world.Guess it would be a little harder to steal Iranian oil from the Caspian basin/Zagros belt if Iran has the means to defend itself. Stay hard Iran.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article