UPDATED ON:
Saturday, October 18, 2008
18:28 Mecca time, 15:28 GMT
 
News Middle East
Al-Sadr condemns Iraq security plan

Supporters of al-Sadr turned out in force for Friday's rally in Baghdad against a deal with US [EPA]

Supporters of Muqtada al-Sadr, a populist Shia leader, have gathered in the Iraqi capital, to demand the immediate withdrawal of US troops and to condemn a planned US-Iraq security deal.

The march began in Sadr City, a poor suburb of Baghdad, on Saturday and was planned to end in nearby Mustansiriya Square.

The protest was originally to be held on April 9, the anniversary of the fall of Saddam Hussein's government, but was postponed due to violent clashes between al-Sadr's al-Mahdi Army fighters and US and Iraqi forces.

"No, No, to America! No, No to the devil!"shouted crowds of men, women and children as they walked through the streets of Sadr City towards Mustansiriya Square, a distance of about three kilometres.

A message from al-Sadr, reported to be in Iran, was read out at the protest by Sheikh Abdul-Hadi al-Mohammadawi, his aide, calling on the Iraqi parliament to reject a US-Iraqi security pact that would extend the presence of American forces in Iraq.

Community resistance

Abdulhay Yahya Zalloum, an Iraqi analyst and author, told Al Jazeera the pact is facing resistance from most communities in Iraq.

"It is not only al-Sadr that is opposed to this so-called security pact ... the Christian community, at least a big chunk of it, as well as most of the Sunni community oppose it too.

"Very recently the Sunni community declared that it is against Islam to have any security pact with the United States.

"We have to realise that, firstly, the United States came uninvited and, secondly, this so-called draft has been negotiated while 150,000 American troops plus contractors, 50,000 of them at least, are still in Iraq.

"Thirdly, it is a government that was actually chosen by the Americans, therefore when you have a country under occupation with pseudo-indepence, you don't expect that the terms would be to the best interests of Iraq."

Country's 'stigma'

Al-Sadr said that anybody who claims the agreement will end "the occupation of our land," or "tells you that it gives Iraqi sovereignty is a liar".

He also said that the deal "will stigmatise Iraq and its government for years to come".

US and Iraqi officials have a December 31 deadline for reaching a security agreement [EPA]
The public show of opposition comes as US and Iraqi leaders near a December 31 deadline to reach agreement on the deal.

An agreement on a draft security deal has reportedly been reached, which would govern the future status of US forces in Iraq after the present UN mandate ends in December.

But the pact has still to be approved by leaders of both countries.
  
Details have not been made public.
  
A point of contention in the months-long negotiations has been whether US troops and contractors would fall exclusively under US jurisdiction if accused of serious crimes in Iraq.

Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, said on Friday in Washington that US military leaders "are all satisfied that our men and women in uniform serving in Iraq are well protected".

Bahraini official's visit

In other news, Bahrain's foreign minister arrived in Baghdad on Saturday for a one-day visit. Bahrain named a new ambassador to Iraq last month.

The Iraqi foreign ministry said Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al-Khalifa will hold talks with his Iraqi counterpart, Hoshyar Zebari.

More senior Arab politicians and diplomats have started to visit Iraq in a sign of increasing ties between Iraq and its neighbours.

Three years ago, Bahrain's high-level envoy in Iraq, Hassan Malallah al-Ansari, was wounded when attackers tried to abduct him on his way to work in Baghdad.

 Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Feedback Number of comments : 12
 
glen roberts
United States
18/10/2008
Al Sadr Condemns...
Al Sadr has a crowd of supporters, but when anti-U.S. protesters crowd Baghdad streets, I doubt it's all just Al Sadr's crowd. If they had the organizational smarts to repeat the protest every Satuday, I think the crowd size would explode to hundreds of thousands from all sectors, including foreigners from around the world. Glen Roberts, nottalkradio.com

Roger Slade
Canada
18/10/2008
Instigating a Million Deaths is a Pretty Serious Crime
What is that part: "IF accused of serious crimes in Iraq"? Every American with a gun in Iraq is guilty of serious crimes.

Andy
United States
19/10/2008
Hey Canada, go play hockey. leave the World to the real players. every body knows Bush went into Iraq for all the wrong reasons, now we must pull out for all the right reasons. would it make you feel better if We left and 1million more died in the power vacuum?? i seem to think Canadians don't know what they are talking about.

TheSinclair
Australia
19/10/2008
Hi Randy James
The vast majority of Americans "went" to this War for NO good & unclear reason So you guys can not just wash yourself clean and end this 'story' with a new president. In my opinion This War needs to be investigate - and bring those responsible Criminals to justice. If American are brave & confident enough, they may put this case to International Criminal Court. If justice not served - peace will be far way from many of us.

Tom
New Zealand (Aotearoa)
19/10/2008
Al-Sadr condemns Iraq security pact
The only fair and democratic way to detirmine the will of the Iraqi people is to hold a referendum on the issue. But of course everyone will know the outcome of such a referendum.

k.
Afghanistan
19/10/2008
In this era of US-led democracy it can hardly be expected that the pain and burden so small a minority in Iraq should be preferred to the comfort of millions in America.

Victor
United States
19/10/2008
No more.
There should not be any security agreements between the US and Iraq. The country is a melting pot of trouble and they deserve to be left alone in their dismal abyss of of killings for political & religious absurdities. The US should say goodbye. The objective has been met, Saddam is dead. Next time, we'll just let the Israelis take care of the middle east and their despots.

boy_george
Israel
19/10/2008
Al Sadr condemns Security Pact
It is quite absurb for US Soldiers to insists on staying in Iraq when the Iraqs are telling them to go home. Well the oil producing nations can raise the price of oil until US decides to get out of Iraq.

Greggory Moore
United States
19/10/2008
Al-Sadr condemns Iraq security plan
Just how and when the U.S. should get out of Iraq is a question I don't pretend to know the answer to (though of course I'm not particularly big on sending our military anywhere, especially under false pretenses) but I get pretty annoyed at unnecessary sticking points, such as whether U.S. soldiers ought to be subject to Iraqi laws when they are in Iraq and commit little crimes like, say, rape and murder. Yes, I want the soldiers protected but not for their individual wrongs.

randy james
United States
18/10/2008
Americans in Iraq
The vast majority of Americans want to return Iraq to the people of Iraq. We are told that if we leave, armed militias such as Al Sadr's will take over, and thousands of innocent civilians will be killed. The goals of George Bush do not reflect the reasons Americans have supported this war. Over 4000 Americans have died to give Iraqi people a chance for democracy, life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, nothing more. Bush will be gone in 3 months. We Americans are not your enemies.

Wayne Lewis
Canada
18/10/2008
Al-Sadr condemns Iraq security plan
Making a deal with an army that illegally invaded your country, has killed hundreds of thousands of innocent citizens and is now in the process of carving up your only worthwhile resource. That's complete capitulation and your people will NEVER be free.

Tom Van Luven
United States
19/10/2008
Two-Faced Mullahs
Certainly the U.S. occupation has been a disaster still, one wonders how much these Mullahs care about their own people, particularly the Sunnis. They say it is against Islam to have any pact with the U.S. (???) but what did they say when Saddam was ruling the country? Particularly when he was killing Sunni Kurds? Under a foreign, non-Muslim occupier the clerics can speak their mind condemning Saddam would have been a death sentence.

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article