UPDATED ON:
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
00:52 Mecca time, 21:52 GMT
 
News Middle East
UK foreign minister meets Assad

Miliband said Syria could be a force for stability
or a force for instability in the region [AFP]
 

David Miliband, the British foreign minister, has held talks with Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, in Syria's capital, Damascus.

Miliband's direct talks with the Syrian leader on Tuesday are the first by a British foreign secretary since 2000.

During the talks, Miliband said Syria can be "constructive" in helping to build comprehensive peace in the Middle East.

"We all now have choices to make on how to fulfil comprehensive peace," Miliband told a news conference in Damascus after the talks.

Miliband's visit marks a slight thaw in relations between London and Damascus, which deteriorated in the wake of the February 2005 killing of Rafiq al-Hariri, a former Lebanese prime minister.

Syria has been accused of involvement in al-Hariri's assassination in order to maintain control over Lebanon. Syria has denied any role.

Key player

"It is very important to understand that Syria has a big potential role to play in stability in the Middle East," Miliband told BBC radio on Tuesday.

"Over the last 18 months, I have been talking with the Syrian foreign minister about ... Syria's responsibilities in the region in respect of counter-terrorism, in respect of Iraq, in respect of the Middle East peace process," Miliband said.

"It can be a force for stability or it can be a force for instability."

The US has accused Syria of turning a blind eye to groups fighting against the US military in Iraq, but diplomatic contacts between Europe - notably France and Britain - and Damascus have increased in recent months.

The British foreign secretary also met other senior Syrian leaders on Tuesday, including his counterpart, Walid Moualem, who said the talks laid down the foundation for strong ties between the two countries.

Miliband has welcomed Syria's 'new approach' to regional diplomacy [AFP]
In London last week, Miliband welcomed Syria's "new approach" to regional diplomacy, saying it could help stabilise the Middle East.

Britain has supported ongoing rounds of indirect peace talks between Syria and Israel, which have been brokered by Turkey.

Those negotiations have revolved around the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau that Israel captured from Syria during a Middle East war in 1967.

Damascus has also come under increasing pressure from the US to police its western border with Iraq.

Washington says the 2,000km-long border is a route for smugglers and foreign fighters who go on to launch attacks in Iraq.

Nuclear report

Miliband's visit comes as the United Nations' nuclear inspectorate prepares to report its findings on samples gathered from the site of an alleged nuclear reactor in Syria, which Israeli aircraft bombed in September 2007.

Mohammed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on Monday that traces of uranium found at the site in June are not sufficient evidence of a covert nuclear programme.

Uranium particles discovered thus far by IAEA investigators in Syria were not enriched to a level suggestive of a nuclear weapons programme, he said.

"[The uranium] could have come in so many different ways ... We are looking at so many different scenarios," he said.

"We need co-operation from Syria; we need co-operation from Israel. I would still like more transparency from the Syrians."

 Source: Agencies
Feedback Number of comments : 8
 
han
United States
19/11/2008
Syria
Bringing in Syria from the "cold" can only be beneficial to the peace process. Without dialogue, no peace can happen. this is a good step to world peace.

Lez
Romania
19/11/2008
Reply to Han
How can an American preach about peace, when his/her country commits aggression (war not authorised by the Security Council), its armed forces and civilian contractors kill civilians, women, children, resorts to tortures, intrudes the land of allies and kills the ordinary citizens of the friendly countries? In a democratic country, which the US purports to be, the majority rules, and the minority takes the benefit and liabilities of that rule. For reference look at the fate of Nazi Germany.

Ben
United States
19/11/2008
Lez, do you understand that a country's actions don't always reflect the wishes and values of its citizens. You'd be hard pressed to find someone who agrees with all of the policies of the past eight years and I would be a little more careful with throwing around the example of Nazi Germany, I tend to find that very offensive to have my country grouped with that horrendous regime.

living
Afghanistan
20/11/2008
HYPOCRITES SHOULDNT TALK
the hypocritical americans have invaded countries on lies, them with the real culprits israel, millions of iraqi refugees, the middle east in tatters and why? because israel like a little child feels "threatened" and a "victim" and sends in big brother now. no israel would mean lasting peace. then they wonder why they are the most hated in the world, go figure. P.S, there is good and bad in all.

Gary
Canada
20/11/2008
"We have found the enemy, and they are US"
Ben, no, I would agree with Lez. The Americans just don't realize the degree to which the rest of the world hates them. Money (even worthless money) obscures that. 75% of American voters, when you include those who didn't vote at all, were responsible for bush being elected twice. Your country has caused the deaths of more than a million Iraqis. Considering education and post-WW II learning at your disposal, the United Hates of America has shown itself to be a worse regime than the Nazis.

DGS/iLLUMINATI korp
Canada
21/11/2008
A few corrections
I think there needs to be some clarification on a couple of these posts. First, some of you need to check out some history. The Union Bank of America, see PRESCOT BUSH, bought and paid for the Nazi regime in Germany. So goes grandpa so goes grandson. "FIRST STRIKE" under the guise of "protecting its citizens" is a Naizi idea. There is a reason the US is being compares to the Third Reich. It fits. Second, the US voters did not put Bush in office. The S. Court (1st) and DIEBOLD (2nd).

sonia
Lebanon
19/11/2008
isolate Iran......from allied syria!
Syria once an enemy Now an improving friend. Just another day in the office. remember before the Iraq war make peace in Palestine & start war in Iraq. then they turn there back on Palestine & feed them to the ????. Now making peace with Syria while preparing to go to war in the near future with allied Iran (next few years). then after Syria will be next. arrggghhh!! I can't believe the public buys this propaganda the west is committing. The Donkey does not hit its head twice!! The public has.

Musty
Australia
20/11/2008
Lure the son & execute the mum.
Simple, lure the son From the mum who will be helpless with out her son & vice versa. I hope the Syrians don't fall for this or they will end up in the DEAD end alone! once it's mother Iran is Executed! The Arabs fell for it after 1991, peace in Palestine,& war with Iraq. Syria be careful, goes with all Arab countries, the west is following the interest of only one country? When the west has a hidden agenda they turn to make peace in Palestine. Remember this quote. PEACE R. MAP. Smell of war!

 
ARTICLE TOOLS
 Email Article  Email article
 Print Article  Print article
 Send Feedback  Send feedback
 Share article  Share article